NOTE: The opinions and commentary expressed in this
essay are those of the author and are an exercise of free speech. They do not
necessarily represent the views of Free State Project Inc., its Directors, its
Officers, or its Participants.
Everything I Own Has Got Wheels underneath It
by Glen Hubbell
You will never be able to clearly measure how much of your current,
economic life is determined and controlled by other people until you commit
to the full time RV lifestyle.
The most obvious difference is the cost of your home: A good used motorhome
or travel trailer can be bought for under $20,000 and paid off in a few
years as a simple car loan. A conventional stationary home will cost you
far, far more and require decades to pay off.
The next most obvious difference are the taxes and other assorted fees: An
RV can be licensed and insured in the cheapest possible state (Nevada is
very popular). A conventional stationary home, on the other hand, is a easy
target for every tax proposal, insurance scheme, and community improvement
scam imaginable.
The third most obvious difference is the utilities: In an RV you own your
own utilities. You can make any alterations or improvements you like,
within the limits of common sense highway safety regulations, and can shop
around for the best buys (non-fluoridated water, cheap propane,
next-generation storage batteries, etc). In a conventional stationary home,
you are told what utility services you can have, how much they will cost,
and you will need to get permits to alter or improve anything - or face
stiff penalties.
The single most expensive cost related to operating an RV is the cost of
fuel and repairs required to drive it. Here though, a wide variety a
strategies have evolved to suit every budget and purpose.
Some people never go anywhere. They buy a piece of land and park the rig,
or pay a small rent to hook up to a friends house, or get a long term
caretakers job which allows them to hook up for free.
Other people bounce from place to place as money or jobs allow. Others make a habit of moving from one free campground to another (up to 14 day
limit). Others, like myself, park the rig somewhere as a base camp and
use a smaller camper to do all the exploring and sightseeing.
And finally, because of space and weight considerations, everything you own
or want to own must be thought about and justified: the barbell set and the
aerobic jungle gym thing? The two car garage full of stuff you might need
someday? 100 different clothing outfits with matching shoes? Probably not
easy to justify.
Once you get through this process and work out your personal system, you
will find a level of economic freedom you never thought possible. Also this
will be a freedom that you create and control every day - not a political
freedom that requires agreement with other people or a cultural freedom
that constantly requires you to tell other people to mind their own
business.
NOTE: The opinions and commentary expressed in this
essay are those of the author and are an exercise of free speech. They do not
necessarily represent the views of Free State Project Inc., its Directors, its
Officers, or its Participants.
The Free State Project
A Search for a Different Way to Govern
By Jason Sorens
On October 1, 2003 an organization called the Free State Project announced
that its membership, numbering over 5,000, had voted to move to New Hampshire.
The Free State Project is an all-volunteer organization dedicated to recruiting
20,000 activists to move to a single state. Its ideology can be described as
"classical liberal" or "libertarian"; its only statement of policy, the
Statement of Intent one signs to become a member, says simply that the maximum
role of government should be to protect life, liberty, and property-the Lockean
formula.
The attraction of the Free State Project for classical liberals is
apparent. Classical liberals and libertarians see themselves as being outside
the left-right spectrum and regard the liberal-conservative,
Democratic-Republican dichotomy as sterile. In national politics, libertarian
ideas command respect but little power. Policy makers and analysts often
concede privately that Social Security needs radical reform, or that
supply-side strategies of controlling drugs ("the War on Drugs") are futile,
but libertarian solutions to these problems face massive opposition from
organized special interests and bear the additional burden of persuading
officials to voluntarily surrender some of their power. It is natural, then,
that many classical liberals would view the Free State Project as a rational
strategy for increasing the political potential of their ideas. By conservative
estimates, relocating 20,000 libertarian activists to a small state would
increase their saturation 100 times over, thus having an immense impact on the
local visibility and prominence of libertarian ideas.
At the same time, the Free State Project offers the prospect of renewed
vitality of the entire American system. In New Hampshire, the debate about the
Project's goals and prospects has been vigorous, with some newspapers and
politicians welcoming participants and others announcing opposition to
libertarian goals. It's not surprising that the Project has both supporters and
detractors, but it is interesting that even detractors have welcomed the fact
that the Project is likely to shake up the political scene and invigorate
political debate. Whatever else happens, the Free State Project is likely to
break one-dimensional liberal-conservative competition into multi-dimensional
competition truer to ideological fundamentals.
We can identify at least three dimensions in which political competition
and debate will take place. The first dimension is economic freedom versus
economic control. New Hampshire is a state noted for its economic freedom, one
of the reasons it was chosen by Free State Project participants. It has the
second-lowest state and local tax rates in the country (after Alaska, which
wins because of the oil-funded Permanent Fund), and state house representatives
have not raised their $100 per annum salaries since 1889. New Hampshire
consistently ranks high in measures of economic freedom and small business
friendliness. The second dimension is personal freedom versus personal control.
This dimension cannot logically be separated from the first, but allegiances
are often reversed in the contemporary political scene: those who favor
regulations on abortion or drugs are not necessarily keen on regulations on
business, and vice versa. New Hampshire, additionally, has a reputation for
tolerance and a culture of individual responsibility; it lacks motorcycle
helmet laws and requires seatbelt usage only for minors.
However, I would like to address a third dimension of politics: centralism
versus localism. During the 20th century, the U.S. government became
progressively more centralized, more bureaucratic and more distant from the
citizens. Part of this trend was due to the extremely regrettable association
between federalist rhetoric and support for state governments' persecution of
their own citizens. In the 21st century, a new federalist agenda will take its
strength from the failure of the national government to adequately address the
challenges of globalization, education and productivity, local cultures and
civil liberties. To many Americans, the federal government is dangerously
removed from citizen control, making the post-9/11 erosion of constitutional
freedoms all the more frightening.
The new federalism takes its agenda from the politics of human scale.
Governments work best when officials are close to the citizens and accountable
to them, and when a shared culture supports competitive, representative,
limited institutions of government. The writers of the Federalist Papers were
wrong when they argued that a large republic was better than a small one. They
assumed a central government that did little more than coordinate activities
among the states and interact with foreign powers. How much sense does it make
today to have 435 representatives in Washington, D.C. setting education, health
and welfare, housing, regulatory, taxation, pensions, and criminal policy for a
vast country of 280 million? The new federalism revives the idea that while
federal government should exist to represent the citizens on the world stage,
to facilitate cooperation and trade among the states, and to prevent states and
localities from violating the rights of their citizens, all other policies
should be decided at the lowest possible level, closest to the citizen.
Will the Free State Project lead to a revival of federalism? I suspect it
may; decentralization is the order of the day in Europe, Canada and elsewhere,
and this trend will arrive on our shores soon. By helping to reinforce and
build strong local communities and cultures in New Hampshire, the Free State
Project will set the stage for a competent decentralization of powers in New
Hampshire and other states are likely to seek the same benefits. The Free State
Project may give that first push need to peacefully topple distant,
dehumanizing structures of power and domination. ?
Jason Sorens is lecturer of Political Science at Yale. He is the founder
and former President of the Free State Project. It is online at
freestateproject.org.
This article was originally at
www.thepolitic.org/news/2004/12/24/Opinion/The-Free.State.Project-582466.shtml.
Note the strange date 12/24/04. (It should really be 12/24/03!)
NOTE: The opinions and commentary expressed in this
essay are those of the author and are an exercise of free speech. They do not
necessarily represent the views of Free State Project Inc., its Directors, its
Officers, or its Participants.
Song for a Free State
By Philip Denisch
We came for freedom, we came for peace,
The gears of state will lack our grease.
We came for liberty, we came for air,
We're Free State people, awfully rare.
We left our homes, we left our farms,
We won't forget our firearms.
We left our cities, we left our states,
We're Free State people, not inmates.
We went for life, we went for zest,
Laissez-faire is always best.
We went for good, we went for right,
We're Free State people, see our light.
We stand for justice, we stand for truth,
We stand together, age and youth.
We stand for wisdom, we stand for reason,
We're Free State People in any season.
NOTE: The opinions and commentary expressed in this
essay are those of the author and are an exercise of free speech. They do not
necessarily represent the views of Free State Project Inc., its Directors, its
Officers, or its Participants.
Quest for Liberty
by Phyllis Schatz
|
For five decades and more
I watched in isolated dismay
As one by one the freedoms
Of my childhood slipped silently away
Where has Liberty gone? I cried
Can it be the Bill of Rights has died?
Through the Magic of Internet
Like-minded souls I gladly met
LP will save you, they spoke
Come join us, 'tis no joke
But only Rep and Dem are truly of note
To think otherwise is to waste a vote
All want to be free, yet fear the cost
Of state entitlements to be lost
Show us this is no dream, they entreat
Then your standards we will gladly meet
Enter the answer to hopes and dreams
Free State Project, the greatest of schemes
Gather in one state to make presence known
Where freedom and tolerance will be shown
A shining example for all to see
'Til all the nation demands to be free
We seek not force, but to assist
Bringing back the freedom that's been missed
Free State Project, you are so great
You will make a near-perfect state
20,000 to show the way
That Liberty may come in our day
|
NOTE: The opinions and commentary expressed in this
essay are those of the author and are an exercise of free speech. They do not
necessarily represent the views of Free State Project Inc., its Directors, its
Officers, or its Participants.
Recipe for a Free State
by Philip Denisch
Cake Ingredients:
1 1/2 cups (3/4 pound) butter
1 pound confectioner's sugar (10x powdered)
6 eggs
1 teaspoon vanilla
2 3/4 cups flour
chocolate chips (milk chocolate, semi-sweet, and mini size)
chocolate bars (milk chocolate, white chocolate, and dark chocolate)
Run to the oven and quickly set the dial for 325 degrees Fahrenheit, because
we can’t get a free state fast enough. Then slow down, realizing it won't
be had in a day.
Skip to the freezer, because you're happy the free state is on its way and
place the chocolate bars inside. Go to the sink, turn the water on and marvel
at the wonders of indoor plumbing. If you don't have indoor plumbing, what are
you doing baking a cake?!
The grizzlies are probably just outside your door, watch out! Run! Run! For
the rest of us, walk to the refrigerator and take out the butter. Hold them
high in the air as you make aaah-aah angel sounds and gently place each of the
3 sticks of butter on the counter top. Honor them and say their names with
reverence as you lay them down. The stick of Liberty, the stick of justice, and
the stick of commerce.
Skip over to a chair and study Ludwig Von Mises's "Human Action". The
butter should be soft by now. Place the butter into a large bowl (again with
the aaah-aah angel sounds). Get out your handy-dandy hand mixer, although it
doesn't mix hands nor does it mix things by hand, anyway… turn it on and
mix up the butter until the liberty, justice and commerce are blended well
together, or is it blended together well.
Either way, journey over to the cabinet and get out your powdered sugar.
Gently pour the sweet sense-of-life powdered sugar into the butter while
reciting the Ode to the FSP and mix until they meld into a joyous combination
of complimentive tastes. At this point you may want to stick your finger in and
take a taste -- well worth it. You could use a spoon if there's someone
watching.
After that, locomote over and fetch your eggs. You will want to add one ovum
at a time to the mix, stirring well between each addition. May I suggest first,
that you start with the egg of freedom, from which all else grows. Next the egg
of capitalism, to bring about a standard of living next to none. The egg of
tolerance should be next, so that even those not just quite like you won't get
in the way of getting your freedom. The egg of bravery can go in next, for the
cooking of a free state won't always be easy. The egg of wisdom needs to be in
there also, difficult to get, but worth a great price. The final egg is
tenacity, sometimes you just need to keep on going.
Add the vanilla next. The potent, almost pungent, extract that gives a zing,
without overpowering. Kinda like the eccentricities of those "unique" people
with "refreshing viewpoints "we meet from time to time.
The final addition to the base of the cake is flour. Solid, firm, reliable
flour. Think of it as common sense, holding together the other ingredients.
Permeating the whole, saturating the entire conglomeration with sagacity and
reason. Intoning upon the totality of the project a sense of…sorry, got
carried away a bit.
Slowly add the flour while beating, recalling the main points of John Galt's
radio speech to the country. Mixing by hand or better yet with spoon in hand,
introduce the chocolate chips into the batter. First the semi-sweet, only half
the bag, though, we don’t want too much homogeny. Add the teeny-tiny
chips next, this will please all of the miniarchists. The milk-chocolate chips
can be sent in next to mix with the whole and, like the others, never lose
their own identity.
Get the chocolate bars out of the freezer, take the white and dark chocolate
ones and throw them into the trashcan, we don’t want any violent
extremists. Break up the milk chocolate bar with the back of a spoon and
crumble it into the mix. All the little odd bits-and-pieces will help hold the
whole thing together.
Pour the batter into one 10 inch tube pan (for you big, out-west types) or
two 9 x 5 inch loaf pans (for you "right-coasters") while singing the Ray
Charles version of "America". Place into the oven for about an hour or until a
wooden pick comes out clean. Re-read Leonard Read's "I, Pencil" while smoking
a cigar, puffing a pipe, quaffing an India Pale Ale, guzzling a glass of ouzo,
talking dirty under your breath or whatever else you want to do until it's time
to prepare the frosting.
When the cake is done, let it cool in the pan 5 minutes and then cool on a
wire rack completely before frosting, we wouldn't want the thing to tear apart
when we try to frost it, now would we?
Frosting Ingredients:
1 cup milk
instant pudding (4 serving size), any flavor, chocolate's my favorite,
as if you didn't know
1/2 cup powdered sugar
8 oz. tub frozen whipped topping
Mosey on over to the freezer and take the frozen whipped topping out and put
it into the refrigerator. Read Ayn Rand's "Philosophy: Who needs it", and
Murray Rothbard's "Man, Economy and State". That should be enough time for the
whipped topping to thaw.
In a bowl, pour in the milk. You are, of course, Free To Choose and pour the
milk right on the table, but trust me on this, it works better if you use a
bowl.
Add the instant pudding mix next, beating and whipping and stirring. A bit
of sweet, sense-of-life powdered sugar next that makes you want to stand up and
say, "When in the course of human events…"Do some more beating and
whipping and stirring.
Now, gently, and I mean this, gently take the whipped topping and fold it
slowly and carefully into the pudding mix. Pretend you're writing a
constitution or something and you want to make sure each word is exactly right,
each phrase, just as it should be.
When the mixture is consistent, pause for a moment, and think about a
distant ancestor who may have been enjoying a nice juicy root he'd just dug up
at this time of day.
The penultimate step is to frost the cake, and remember, if you don't make a
mess, you're not doing it right. The last step is to share this cake and what
it means with as many people as you can, so we can all eat cake -- and in this
one instance only, have it too.
Frosting
variation: make 1/2 or 1/4 of recipe with different pudding flavors and swirl
them around to give that "a-herd-of-cats-just-stampeded-on-my-cake" look.
Aug 6, 2002
The views expressed in this essay do not necessarily represent those of
Free State Project, Inc., its Directors, or its Officers.
NOTE: The opinions and commentary expressed in this
essay are those of the author and are an exercise of free speech. They do not
necessarily represent the views of Free State Project Inc., its Directors, its
Officers, or its Participants.
Place your cursor over the noddwords (new and odd) words to
see my original intent.
It's a shame everyone can't do the same with the
Constitution :)
Porçerwocky
by Phil Denisch
'Twas chattig
and the govy beauves,
Did byre and givle in the hof;
All ovis were the citioves,
And the jabuthus aratuf.
"Prepare the
Porçerwock, my son!
The quills that guard, the feet that walk!
Prepare the plebpleb bird, and run
The lofitus solisilock."
He took his epeel pen in hand:
Long list of brarous names he sought–
So tested he by the Yallee tree,
And coalesced his thought.
And, as in libbish thought he stood,
The Porçerwock, with unknown name,
Came deeving through the world for good,
And zeecosed on the aim.
Five thou, Five thou! And on to twenty,
The epeel pen had found its knack,
A state to choose, and never lose,
Of freberty we'll never lack.
"And hast thou deign the Porçerwock?
Come to your state, all happy signers!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
You are the sun out-shiners!"
Not chattig nor the govy beauves,
No byre and givle in the hof;
Now pardus are the dorsatii
And all the ushakus livee.
This is the kind of thing that can happen when you have unprotected sex with the muses.
With apologies to Mr. Carroll's original.
NOTE: The opinions and commentary expressed in this
essay are those of the author and are an exercise of free speech. They do not
necessarily represent the views of Free State Project Inc., its Directors, its
Officers, or its Participants.
Quality of Living: A New Recruitment Strategy for the FSP
Address to First Annual Porcupine Freedom Festival
by Jason Sorens 26 June 2004
Well, the topic of my talk is supposed to be, "We're Making History." But
I think that part of the Free State Project is pretty much self-evident, so I'm
going to concentrate on some more subtle aspects of the Free State Project,
grouped under the general heading, "Quality of Living."
The Free State Project appeals, I think, to the project pursuer in all of
us. (And here I am going to touch on the formal title of the talk.) Human
beings are naturally project pursuers. We aren't content with merely surviving
in a hand-to-mouth existence, or in a totally unreflective hedonism, or in a
mindless collective stupor. We're beings that wish to shape the environment in
which we live, to see our intentionality reflected in our surroundings and
respected by others. The libertarian philosopher Loren Lomasky even believes
that this capacity and yearning for pursuing projects is the aspect of our
nature that yields moral rights and responsibilities toward each other.
The Free State Project itself is obviously a grand project aimed at
enhancing the environment in which we all live, and I think part of the lure of
participation is that it invites us to imagine what could happen if people
really could translate more of their hopes and dreams into reality by working
together. The original idea behind the Free State Project was that those of us
who favor a freer society could actually make some of our visions of the future
come true, while the alternative seemed to be simply allowing distant political
forces continue to act without regard for our persistent, sincere interests and
demands. So that much is clear the Free State Project is a loose
coordinating mechanism that should yield substantial political reform. But I
believe that to sell the FSP to the 14,000 additional people we're looking for,
we need to emphasize the nonpolitical features of the FSP that affect our
Quality of Living but that may have been overlooked to date.
First of all, the FSP isn't about instantiating some kind of society that
seems ideal in the abstract. It's about very concretely and incrementally
improving the conditions of living for everyone. What I'm thinking about here
is the fact that a free society allows for diversity in people's projects. So
long as they don't hurt others, people are permitted to pursue their own
projects and plans of living in a free society. Individuals will be much
happier the freer they are to design their own immediate environment and join
together with others voluntarily to shape the wider environment. Even more
than that, though, I think human beings enjoy observing the projects of
others. Why do we like to travel? I think one of the biggest motivating
factors in leisure travel is the desire to see how other people live.
Sometimes we can find out through travel ways of living superior to what we are
used to. For my wife and myself, selling our car and living an urban
neighborhood lifestyle in New Haven, Connecticut was partly stimulated by our
experiences in Europe. But even when I observe a way of life that I would not
want for myself, I can respect that way of life and relish the fact that people
are allowed to live that way if they want to. Because I know that their
freedom means reciprocal freedom for me I can feel more secure in my
life plans when others are secure in theirs. A free society allows significant
diversity in projects within the same society or population. You don't need to
travel to appreciate the ways different people live in a free society. The
Free State Project enhances quality of living by allowing for a greater
diversity of projects that we can observe and participate in if we choose.
Second, quality of living is enhanced by enjoying access to others'
talents, capabilities, and interests. The social aspect of the Free State
Project comes in here. While we've always wanted the FSP to be loose and
decentralized, totally nonhierarchical and noncommunal in the strict
sense of that word, we have to admit that the FSP has its own social aspect.
By participating in the FSP, you have an immediate bond with a number of people
sharing some of the same interests. Everyone in the FSP shares a common
ideological background, but there are many different backgrounds in the FSP as
far as culture, ethics, religion, and aesthetics. We need to make it easy for
people involved in the FSP to find others both within the FSP and in the
existing population of New Hampshire with the same interests and general
goals. The social aspects of the FSP were what impressed me most when I
revisited New Hampshire for the first time since my wife's and my first
anniversary in 1999. That was just a couple of months ago, and I met other
Free Staters and friendly Granite Staters at a barbecue in Somersworth. It was
clear that people who move to New Hampshire are getting the royal treatment.
They're invited to parties, they can get help moving in, they hold regular
get-togethers, and they're plugged into the political scene in any ways they
wish to participate.
So I think we're seeing some of that same social dynamic here at the First
Annual Porcupine Freedom Festival. Let's face it, it's nice to have friends.
Many of the projects we as individuals wish to pursue require the cooperation
of others of like mind. Socialists have frequently claimed that human beings
are social animals, and that this mere fact meant that individual rights do not
exist. It's true that human beings are social animals, but it's a system of
equal maximum freedom that allows individuals to maximize their voluntary
and effective cooperation for common goals. So I think one of the Free State
Project's campaigns will be, more or less, "You have a friend in New
Hampshire." That's simply one of the benefits of participating in the FSP and
moving here.
Another aspect of Quality of Living is simply what New Hampshire already
has to offer. New Hampshire has consistently been ranked as having among the
best, if not the best, qualities of life among all 50 states. The numerous
advantages of New Hampshire are catalogued on our website, but we need to go
further and tailor specific information for people considering relocating.
That will be a large task, but I think we have to recognize that people
participate in the Free State Project only when it suits their own life plans.
And that's the way it should be. The Army advertises an "Army of One" to
potential recruits, and we need to stress a "Free State Project of One." One
idea to address this point might be to have permanent counselors who can give
some advice to participants and potential participants about economic
opportunities in their field, their particular tax situation in New Hampshire,
where to find out about real estate, and so on. Some people may, because of an
unusual situation, find that they don't get a tax cut from moving to New
Hampshire, although I think most will. So then those people will have to
consider whether the other advantages I'm highlighting here make relocation
worthwhile. Certainly we can stress with the Free Staters relocating, future
tax increases in NH are extremely unlikely, so the long-run climate for
investment is quite stable. Probably quite a few more people will find that
their tax burden decreases substantially, but that their wages will take a cut
by moving to New Hampshire. They also have to make a decision as to whether
quality of living makes up for the pay cut. In addition to the quality of
living advantages of the FSP itself, the crime rates in New Hampshire are very
low, natural beauty abounds, the neighborly spirit is strong. All these things
should be enhanced by a migration of likeminded Free Staters attracted by those
qualities.
Another aspect of the "Free State Project of One" approach is to
acknowledge that this is a long-run endeavor. Some people may take a few years
to arrange a relocation around their own life plans. We should encourage
people to do whatever's necessary to ensure that they can eventually
make the move. I certainly applaud those who are moving now, and I know you're
looked on with a bit of awe and respect by others, but at the same time,
there's no reason to pressure everyone to do that. The FSP is a substantial
commitment as it is.
So in short, I think to get our next 14,000 participants, we need to take a
more free-market approach to recruitment. We have something to offer them, and
they have something to offer us. We offer them the prospect of enhanced
quality of living and for some, even long-run monetary rewards, and they can
offer us their commitment to help make those things happen. By stressing these
less tangible but very important rewards of participation, I think we can sell
the FSP much better than by simply focusing on the political-strategy aspects
that originally motivated the idea.
So that's all the serious stuff from me. Now go forth and enjoy
yourselves!
Back to Essays
NOTE: The opinions and commentary expressed in this
essay are those of the author and are an exercise of free speech. They do not
necessarily represent the views of Free State Project Inc., its Directors, its
Officers, or its Participants.
Here Comes Porcer Claus
by Philip Denisch
(With apologies to Here
Comes Santa Claus by Gene Autry)
|
Here comes Porcer Claus! Here comes Porcer Claus!
Right down Porcer Claus line!
Texan and Hexan and all Dorsatii
are pulling on the spines.
Nets are pinging, Tea is flinging;
All is aerie and might.
Yang your clockings and yin your mockings,
'Cause Porcer Claus comes tonight.
Here comes Porcer Claus! Here comes Porcer Claus!
Right down Porcer Claus line!
He's got a state that is filled with the free
for the boys and girls so fine.
Hear that liberty bell ring out loud,
Oh, What a beautiful fight.
So, Dump the red, love that you fled,
'Cause Porcer Claus comes tonight.
|
NOTE: The opinions and commentary expressed in this
essay are those of the author and are an exercise of free speech. They do not
necessarily represent the views of Free State Project Inc., its Directors, its
Officers, or its Participants.
Trading Trash for the Pearl of Great Price
by Nixicat Chesnavich
Just over two years ago, my husband Robert and I bought what was literally once
an abandoned crackhouse in a bad neighborhood. Not only were we able to own a
home for less than most people pay for a car, but we had this idealistic vision
of being a force for good in our city.
We put in long hours of hard work reclaiming a house that by all rights should
have been leveled, slowly turning it into a comfortable place to live. We
bought a how-to book at Home Depot, and it became our bible for the next few
months. We literally removed pieces of broken furniture from the walls and
patched the gaping holes. The front yard was turned gradually from an
impenetrable mass of shoulder high weeds into a slightly disorganized flower
and vegetable garden. Other people in the neighborhood expressed shock that
anyone had been able to save this house, and we had done it on a minimal budget
and with no idea what we were doing.
We were certain that if we set the example, showed people that it could be
done, that others would want to join us. There are around 70 abandoned houses
in this and surrounding neighborhoods, and we really felt that young couples
could be convinced to do what we had done and own their own homes rather than
renting. We planned on going out and picking up the trash on the surrounding
streets, to show people who had given up on this part of town that some of its
residents still cared.
My plan was especially ambitious. I decided that the best way to help the
little welfare-recipients-to-be develop an appreciation for capitalism and
entrepreneurialism was to help them participate in it. I was going to start a
privately funded urban garden on one of the vacant lots, and recruit local
children to work in it for their own benefit. Each child would get a portion
of the lot and instruction in how to make some kind of vegetable or flower
grow, with the intent of letting them take home food for their families or to
help them sell their produce at the local farmers markets. The idea was that
they would come to value work, personal property, and their own ability to
produce wealth.
I was taking the trash out the other night when I looked around my neighborhood
and saw it much as it was two years ago. An abandoned car has sat on the
street just a few yards away since spring. Another car hit it a few weeks ago,
leaving the scene without reporting the accident. My husband has seen
neighbors in a nearby apartment building tossing armfuls of garbage into the
alley that we share with them from a third floor window.
And those lovely children I was going to teach to garden? Well, earlier this
year, some of them tried to break into our basement through the window while
making a candy bar sales round and discovering that we weren't home.
Ironically, I believe they were selling candy for either their government
school or for the after school program that is supposed to keep them out of
such trouble.
And I just got a notice from the city that the "high weeds" in my front yard
were a public health hazard, as they could attract rats. The high weeds were
broccoli plants that were still producing despite the recent cold weather.
We are tired of playing martyr in a place that does not appreciate us. We have
come to realize that the reason this neighborhood is so bad is that the people
who live here like it this way. They enjoy living in rubbish-lined streets and
depending on tax payer funded programs to save them from themselves. And
honestly, it would be entirely unlibertarian of me to try to force them to live
differently. Better to be a Porcupine, and leave them alone while I go tend to
my business elsewhere.
My friends and acquaintances here in Pittsburgh are mostly either socialists or
politically apathetic. They break the laws that don't suit them, depending on
their ability to not get caught to protect them from retribution, rather than
making a stand for their own freedom. And they seem to like the nanny state
that would punish them. Some have even said that they are glad that their
activities are illegal, because it would be dangerous if people were allowed to
do the things that they choose to do. Of course, they are responsible enough
to be allowed to do such things, but no one else would be.
And so I realize that we are already emotionally divorced from this house, this
neighborhood, this city. It isn't home any more, only a holding area where we
may sit while awaiting the vote that will determine where our home truly lies.
The very house that we put so much work and love into is no longer something in
which we have any desire to invest my time and money. We will keep it at its
current standards, and unload it to someone else without much sentimentality
when it comes time to leave here for Free State.
That is how Rob and I have been referring to the state that has yet to be
chosen: Free State. Every time we learn of a new affront to our liberty or a
new program designed to help us if only we would sign over a little more of our
autonomy, we just look at each other and say, "Free State!" We can't wait to
get there.
We have begun to conserve resources that we might have spent trying to effect
change here in this city, preferring to use it strategically in a place where
people want our help. It is all about Free State now. All of our hopes and
ambitions, all of our love, all was completely transferred to a place we have
never seen before as soon as we set our names down as members.
I am planning my greenhouse for construction in some cold northern state. My
coffeeshop will be a great place for some of us transplantees to meet and talk
and work on political endeavors. I hope to take on a second job in the next
few months to earn more money to eliminate our debts so that we can enter Free
State with a completely clean slate and build such a life for ourselves.
We do not belong here anymore. We have both been craving a community of people
that have enough courage in their convictions to make a serious gamble on them.
I have found that in my fellow Porcupines. I would give my life for this hope
that we can carve out a place for ourselves. And I think enough others feel
the same way that I do that we have a real shot. Tears flow free down my
cheeks when I stop to contemplate what we can accomplish if we only dare.
Perhaps because I was raised by Southern Baptists, much of my metaphor is
derived from religious symbolism. I am reminded of the New Testament parable
of the man who finds a field with a great treasure in it. He goes out and
sells everything that he has, his every possession so that he can go buy that
field, and thus possess the pearl of great price.
I feel as though I have been shown such a field, and my liberty is buried in
it. My children's future is buried in it. The hope of my nation, of my
forefathers, of our entire species rests in a little plot of dirt that we
haven't picked out yet, and all we need do is have the courage and the wisdom
to reach out for it. How could I make any choice but to give up everything
that used to matter to me to claim so great a prize?
And I wonder how many others feel like we do. It is my hope that some who are
sympathetic but have not yet committed to join us there in Free State will feel
encouraged to do so by my words. And that those who have joined will be
persuaded to redouble their efforts to recruit the rest of our future
neighbors. We can only do this together, but together, we CAN do it. And we
will.
NOTE: The opinions and commentary expressed in this
essay are those of the author and are an exercise of free speech. They do not
necessarily represent the views of Free State Project Inc., its Directors, its
Officers, or its Participants.
A Plea for Action
by Kat Dillon, 5/18/04
I'm a very quiet person, and consequently, I spend a lot of time observing.
I watch people. I read the news. I listen. It's not a pretty picture out
there.
Here's a question for you: Why are you here? There was something to drove
you to making a drastic move against government encroachment. What was it?
Why did you join the Free State Project? Apparently it was important enough
for you to pledge to move. Was it important enough that you would go out and
tell more people about the FSP? Was it important enough that you would go out
and recruit 3 new people? I think it's not only important, it's vitally
urgent. I think our government is quickly changing from an enormous
all-engulfing bureaucracy into a most frightening tyranny. Time is running out
to do something, anything, to stop it.
The Davidians and their children were burned alive, for what? For running
a legal gun business? For their religious views? For standing up against
government tyranny? There is not and never will be a public outcry against
this from the general public. They believe what they are told by the media.
And the media seem to tell only the government approved version of events.
Prisoners in Iraq and apparently Afghanistan are tortured by our troops.
This was apparently done with either the approval of the executive branch, or
at least a willingness to turn a blind eye. These are the same people willing
to put terrorists in prison without any recourse to due process. No lawyers,
no charges, no chance of release. These are the same people who are willing to
make the definition of terrorist so broad that anyone can be named terrorist.
So exactly how long before we're torturing citizens in prisons here?
I hear on talk radio calls for the draft. Even such places as
worldnetdaily, which is at times suspicious of government encroachment, seems
to be calling for the draft. I was astounded to see one of their polls where
the majority of people were in favor of it. The general public is being
prepped to accept this involuntary servitude. I'm not prepared to give up the
life of my child to bring democracy (mob rule) to Iraq. Or Syria. Or Iran.
Or North Korea.
The economy is downright frightening. George W. is spending like there's
no tomorrow. The value of the dollar continues to fall against foreign
currencies. Wholesale prices are increasing - an indication that the
government is printing so much money, it is worth less, can buy less.
Businesses cannot operate reliably when the law is so screwed up that at any
moment, their livelihoods could become illegal, so of course they're moving
offshore. Will selling fattening foods be illegal soon? Tobacco? The nanny
state is driving this once thriving nation into poverty.
Unfortunately, these are only a few of the examples of why it is so urgent
to act now.
Recruit like your lives depend upon it, because they may.