Your Turn, NH: Free State Project would keep NH government
small
by James Maynard 07/28/03 Guest Commentary
There is a small-government political movement under way which could change
forever the dynamics of the debate over the size and cost of New Hampshire
government, and it has little to do with the current battle raging between Gov.
Craig Benson and Sen. Dick Green.
The Free State Project aims to bring 20,000 small-government activists, donors
and candidates to one state to work within the political process to make
government smaller, less expensive and more accountable. And New Hampshire is
on the "short list" of states the organization is considering for its home.
The group has formed on the Internet (www.freestateproject.org), and it boasts
more than 4,500 members who have pledged to move to the chosen state when the
group reaches its goal of 20,000 members.
The "Live free or die" attitude and history of New Hampshire, along with our
lack of any general sales or income taxes, helmet, adult seat belt or mandatory
insurance laws are just a few of the things which are enticing about New
Hampshire to members of the Free State Project. But what are the benefits for
New Hampshire residents if the project decides to settle in the Granite State?
First, a good percentage of people involved in the project are owners of small
businesses. If the FSP chooses New Hampshire, we will likely see more than
10,000 small businesses relocated to our state, lowering unemployment and
raising wages.
If each of the expected 20,000 members spent just a modest $25,000 a year in
the state, that level of consumerism would infuse our state with an additional
$500 million a year in the New Hampshire economy.
But even more importantly, the members would work to save New Hampshire from
the threat of broadbased taxes and irresponsible spending. The Free State
Project could end big-government spending and the threat of a broadbased tax
forever in the Granite State. It would ensure responsible state spending and
low taxation throughout the state.
At the local level, members of the Free State Project would work with New
Hampshire citizens in town meetings, and in the cities on warrant articles
supporting minimal taxation and opening educational opportunities. They would
work for greater leeway in the use of private property and for the reduction of
unnecessary regulations on free enterprise. This would stir a small business
boom that would embolden the New Hampshire economy for many years to come.
The Free State Project is a mixture of common-sense ideas and thinking outside
the box. While working within the framework and reality of real-life state and
local politics, the group will not be afraid to try new things and take lessons
from the business world to bring New Hampshire a smaller, less expensive, more
accountable government. Working its way through smaller offices and earning
experience and knowledge, the group will help New Hampshire to maintain it's
advantage as a low-tax, small-government state.
While meeting with members of the Free State Project the day after his historic
budget veto, Gov. Benson welcomed the group to "come on up" to New Hampshire.
Above the governor's desk is a painting of former Gov. Meldrim Thomson Jr.
Within the painting of the former governor is a sign on his desk which reads
"Low taxes are the result of low spending." The Free State Project members
agree with this philosophy, as do a majority of New Hampshire residents.
New Hampshire supporters within the Free State Project held a week-long
convention in Lancaster in the last week of June. The event was attended by
people from 22 states and Canada who have pledged to move to the Granite State
to help us in our fight against a broadbased tax if our state is chosen for the
project's goals.
New Hampshire is proud of our independence from government, and this is
reflected in our state's "Live free or die" motto. The New Hampshire supporters
within the Free State Project are working hard to welcome small government
activists to the Granite State.
The group is currently conducting its vote for its state of choice, and anyone
wishing to join the project and cast a vote will need to join before Aug. 15.
New Hampshire is the best choice for the FSP, and the FSP is a great choice for
New Hampshire.
James Maynard lives in Keene and is an assistant at the Antioch College
library.
Opinions expressed in this weekly column aren't necessarily those of The Union
Leader. All readers are welcome to submit essays of up to 750 words for the
editor's consideration. Please include a word or two about yourself, along with
name, address, phone number and, if possible, a photograph. Mail to: Your Turn,
c/o The Union Leader, P.O. Box 9555, Manchester, NH 03108 or e-mail
opinion@theunionleader.com. All submissions become property of The Union Leader
and can't be returned.
More media articles about the FSP
These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by
The Free State Project,
a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship,
and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see
US Code Title 17,
Chapter 1, Section 107).
| Original article:
|
courier-littletonnh.com/30list
|
| Date:
| 07/23/03
|
| Title:
| New Hampshire high on list for Free State project
|
| Author:
| Syvia Smith
|
| Publication:
| The Courier
|
New Hampshire high on list for Free State project
by Syvia Smith 07/23/03
LANCASTERFreedoms like being able to purchase beer at grocery
stores and shoot off firecrackers have put the Granite State high on the
list of potential targets for the Free State Project, which wants to enlist
20,000 like-minded people to move to a low-population state in order to
advocate for smaller government.
Participants in the movement recently tested the waters here and found a lot to
their liking.
Along with Montana and Wyoming, New Hampshire is one of the top contenders to
be the chosen state. Heading its list of attractions is New Hampshire's long
history of rejecting taxes and espousing individual rights, according to Free
Staters.
"I'm impressed by the degree of freedom that New Hampshire people enjoy," said
Keith Murphy of Baltimore about his recent week-long participation in a
"Welcome to New Hampshire" fact-finding event last month.
Free Staters assembled at Lancaster's Rogers Campground, at a rented
hospitality house in Jefferson, and toured the state from June 21-29.
Approximately, 150 individuals, many of whom were small business owners,
attended the event. They came from 22 states, from as far away as Oregon.
Reached by phone, Murphy, 28, a legislative assistant in the Maryland
Legislature, said, "If I didn't have other obligations, I'd be in New Hampshire
now." He said his goal during his week in New Hampshire had been to do one
thing every day that he couldn't do in Maryland. "The first day, I rode on one
of those push merry go rounds that have been banned in Maryland," he said.
"Another day I shot off fireworks, illegal in Maryland. And I enjoyed the
convenience, unavailable to us in Maryland, of buying beer in a grocery store."
Murphy was particularly enthusiastic about seeing four zeros in place of the
sales tax amount that would have shown up on a Maryland receipt.
The Free State Project was founded by North Carolina resident Jason Sorens, who
recently earned a doctorate in political science. Sorens, 26, is a member of
the Libertarian Party, but he described the Free State Project as an
independent organization made up not only of Libertarians, who comprise
approximately 40 percent of the membership, but Republicans, independents,
Green Party members, and others with a libertarian bent. Its board of directors
is made up of one Libertarian, Sorens, a Republican, and three Independents.
Sorens describes as "broadly libertarian" the Free State philosophy that a
government's main reason for being is to protect individual rights.
"Our intent is to lend our support to the existing small government movement in
the state that is chosen," said Sorens during a recent phone interview. "It's
appealing that there's a Libertarian network in place in New Hampshire. Also a
plus is the state's cross-nomination system, allowing a candidate to run under
two or more political labels."
Asked if an influx of 20,000 people would strain municipal services, Sorens
said, "We emphasize being a net positive community. We have a high proportion
of professionals and small business owners who would be bringing their capital
and expertise to the state. We would give more into the system than we take
out. Most of our members either home school or private school. We don't believe
in taking welfare."
He continued, "Then again, we are not your typical suburbanites either. We
would, for instance, oppose tax-supported garbage collection and support a plan
to reduce the statewide property tax." Sorens said that those relocating would
have five years to do so. Thus, the exodus would be staggered.
Most of the Free State visitors spent up to a week exploring New Hampshire.
They also attended programs organized by the state Libertarian Party's Welcome
to the Granite-State committee. Michael Badnarik of Austin, Texas, and
Cleveland, Ohio, resident Gary Nolan, who are both seeking the Libertarian
candidacy for president, spoke at one event.
Attendees met with local citizens and business people. Gov. Craig Benson
greeted them during an informal chat during their tour of the State House. John
Babiarz of Grafton, who chairs the N.H. Libertarian Party and ran for governor
in the last election, said that one venture capitalist who is considering
relocating his business here flew in from Nevada to be among those meeting the
governor.
Michelle Dumas, 34, of Somersworth, one of the Welcome to the Granite State
organizers, said several attendees told her they'd each talked to 30 New
Hampshire citizens and gotten only positive responses to the prospect of 20,000
Free Staters relocating here.
To attract people to the New Hampshire fact-finding event, Dumas prepared a
comprehensive report on the state, which can be viewed online at www.lpnh.org,
under "Welcome to New Hampshire." Among the state's attractions, Dumas listed
its ranking by "Liberty Magazine" as having the fourth-lowest taxes per capita
in the nation and that it's alleged to have the highest concentration of
high-tech workers in the U.S. She also noted the state's number 6 ranking from
the Small Business Survival Committee, which evaluates how states and local
governments interact with small businesses and entrepreneurs.
According to The Granite State organizers, attendees responded enthusiastically
to the Granite State's scenic beauty and friendly citizens.
"The striking thing," said Atlanta resident Trevor Snyder during a phone
interview, "is that every person we spoke to said, 'Come and do whatever you
want. As long as you don't bother others, they won't bother you.'"
Synder, an information tech manager for a company that builds airports, noted
that one of his friends had been leaning toward Wyoming, but by the end of the
week, the Granite State had become his top choice.
Others also told organizers that they definitely were going to cast their votes
for the Granite State. "It would be good for the project to come here," said
Dumas. "New Hampshire, known for its spirit of independence, is a state that
reflects their ideals. Of the other states that they have been looking at,
Alaska, Delaware, Idaho, Maine, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont,
Wyoming New Hampshire has the lowest dependence on federal dollars.
Their coming here would help us to build on the strengths of this state."
Jackie Casey of Portland, Ore., already has made plans to relocate to New
Hampshire. The 32-year-old army veteran has worked in software quality
assurance most of her career. After encountering the Libertarian philosophy in
college, she founded the Libertarian Students Club at the University of
Arizona. Casey's father lives in Gilmanton Ironworks, but she says that isn't
the only reason she is coming here. "For me, no state income and sales taxes is
a major attraction."
State Republican Party chair Jayne Millerick of Chichester reacted positively
to the possibility of 20,000 Free Staters moving here.
"The prospect of having a number of active dedicated voters, regardless of
their party affiliation, move to New Hampshire is good for the state. Much of
their ideology, such as individual liberty, personal responsibility, and free
trade is similar to ours. We are good at presenting issues to New Hampshire
voters, regardless of their party ties," she said. "We would enjoy the
challenge of persuading newcomers to vote with us. The larger problem would be
with the Democrats. You'd be hard pressed to find a Libertarian voting
Democratic."
But Pamela Walsh of Concord, the press secretary for the state Democratic
Party, wasn't as pessimistic about the impact on her party.
"We're not opposed to making government smaller, but sometimes things, such as
defense, schools and environmental protection, can only be accomplished by the
community together. We agree with the Libertarians on some issues, such as
personal privacy and the right to free choice in reproductive matters," Walsh
said. "I don't know how they would vote here. They agree with us on some
issues and the Republicans on others. In many ways, they sound as split as the
rest of the electorate."
The Free State Project concept was first proposed by Sorens in a 1971 article
in the online journal "Libertarian Enterprise." Sorens recently earned his
doctorate in political science from Yale. He will be a lecturer at Yale this
fall.
He said his main motivation for the Free State Project was "to really make a
difference somewhere and to show the rest of the country what could be done by
reducing the role of government."
He said, "We believe in bringing policies closer to the local level. The
further away government gets, the more likely it is to tread on individual
freedom."
August 15 is the deadline to sign up for the Free State Project. The movement
needs 5,000 pledged members to vote on the relocation state this fall.
According to Sorens, over 4,400 individuals so far have committed themselves to
the plan. Most of them have signed up online at www.freestateproject.org.
More media articles about the FSP
These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by
The Free State Project,
a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship,
and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see
US Code Title 17,
Chapter 1, Section 107).
Live free of thee
Editorial 07/10/03
What would most of us find wrong with having no income taxes, no regulatory
bureaucracies and fewer laws to regulate gun control and drug use?
Maybe nothing. Maybe a lot. It all depends on our own view of reality.
But New Hampshire's "Live Free or Die" is certainly a motto that appeals to the
"Free State Project," which advocates these standards. Its members are seeking
a place with a warm, cozy political feel that they can call home, and this
state is one they're considering.
If at least 20,000 supporters have signed on by 2006, they'll all move to the
chosen state Alaska, North and South Dakota, Delaware, Montana, Idaho, Maine
and Vermont or here and work to establish their own version of a citizen
non-government in that state, working as a newly viable political force. You
know the big fish/small pond scenario. The concept works. Look what it's done
for Salt Lake City and the state of Utah.
Freedom from government, except where it's needed to protect life, liberty and
property, is the basis of the "Free Staters" movement. Proponents hope to
resettle in an independent-minded state with a "pro-liberty" culture, jobs,
coastal access and a lack of dependence on federal funding.
New Hampshire, for better or worse, welcomes rugged individualism. But people
most likely won't open their arms to welcome a political interest group with
ambitions of controlling a state that's fiercely proud of its own differences.
There's a distasteful artificiality to this concept. Would the proud people of
New Hampshire accept a self-interested group albeit one devoted to independent
living and thinking when it's staking out a territory for political control and
thereby threatening the independence of people here who don't happen to agree
with them?
More media articles about the FSP
These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by
The Free State Project,
a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship,
and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see
US Code Title 17,
Chapter 1, Section 107).
20,000 activists may make N.H. a permanent home
by Adam Leech 07/11/03
news@seacoastonline.com
PORTSMOUTH - New Hampshire and Maine are on a small list of states that a
group of 20,000 advocates of limited government will choose from to organize
their attempt to reduce the size and scope of government.
In September, the 5,000 members of The Free State Project will vote on which
state to move to, where their plan is to increase its membership, reduce state
and local law, reform state and local laws and end federal mandates.
The eight other states that are being considered are Idaho, Alaska, Delaware,
Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming. Eventually the 20,000
members of the group will move to the state which has been chosen.
According to Elizabeth McKinstry, vice president of the project, of the 10
states there are five states that are the most likely candidates. She said
while Maine is not in the upper tier, New Hampshire is one of the most
intriguing possibilities.
"New Hampshire is definitely one of the top contenders," she said.
McKinstry said New Hampshire's long history of small government and limited tax
burden are two of its most appealing features.
"New Hampshire has a strong position on liberty and independence," she said.
"Also, it is absolutely gorgeous, which many members recognize."
The Libertarian Party of New Hampshire formed the Welcome to the Granite State
Committee to promote New Hampshire as the most desirable Free State candidate.
"I'd like to think we're in the lead," said Michelle Dumas, a member of the
committee. Dumas said the project is not necessarily a Libertarian movement but
many of the goals of the project are in line with those of the party.
"It would make sense that we would work together," she said. "We're not trying
to change anything, we're actually trying to make New Hampshire more like
itself."
Dumas said the 400-member State Legislature offers the best representation of
any state in the nation.
"It's a government for the people more than any other state," she said.
According to The Free State Project Web site, of the 16 variables that are
considered most important in choosing a state, New Hampshire ranks in the top
three in 12 categories; Maine ranks high in three. Out of the variables New
Hampshire got the top ranking in six, the most of any state; three more than
runner-up Wyoming.
New Hampshire received the highest rank in:
- low federal dependence
- geography
- low crime rate
- smaller state and local government sector
- livability ranking
- low percentage of National Education Association/ American Federation of
Teachers members
Maine did not receive a top ranking in any category.
McKinstry said among the states being considered all have a population under
1.5 million. Maine and New Hampshire have the highest populations of the
candidates, which is considered a negative attribute.
"Obviously a state with less population will be easier to make an impact on,"
she said.
Maine is not considered to be a top candidate, according to McKinstry.
Dumas pointed to the high tax burden in Maine as a reason why it is not as
attractive as New Hampshire.
"Maine has a lot of good points," she said. "But their are a lot of advantages
in New Hampshire that doesn't seem to be part of [the Maine] culture."
McKinstry said Maine's wilderness and open space is enticing to project
members.
"[Maine] has a lot going for it in terms of quality of life issues," she said.
Rep. Daniel Itse, R-Freemont, said he would not be opposed to the project
settling in New Hampshire because they are free to move as they please. He said
his stance on "small government" is politically close to the project's, as
well.
"For a group of people to pro-actively [move to a state] is a lot better than
the state we have where people ignore politics and don't think they can control
it, so they don't do anything about it," he said. "This is the antithesis."
Rep. Richard Morris, R-S.Hampton, said he is also in favor of less government
and he would welcome discussion with anyone who has ideas on how to reduce
taxes.
"I promote everybody's position of opportunity, if someone thinks something
should be changed then more power to them," he said. "That's one of the things
that makes this country great."
Itse said he thinks the project could have a significant impact because the
House has become more conservative as of late, but he said their impact could
not be overwhelming.
"In a state of 1.3 million, a group of 20,000 may be able to shift a handful of
towns," he said. "But ultimately the public's displeasure with the state
government is what will force change."
Itse said the state currently has 80 conservative Republicans in the House of
Representatives and the movement might be able to push that to 100.
Morris said some of the country's greatest feats were realized by people who
did what they believed, regardless of what anyone had to say to them.
"If you look back historically it was the people with the perseverance and
tenacity who had a passion for their cause that implemented change," he said.
McKinstry said she expects the project to draw people to the state once it is
established, which she expects to take a couple decades.
"We're not looking to do anything radical right off," she said. "Things like
that take time."
More media articles about the FSP
These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by
The Free State Project,
a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship,
and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see
US Code Title 17,
Chapter 1, Section 107).
Free Staters need to temper philosophy with compassion
Editorial 07/13/03
All of us who live here know New Hampshire is a unique state. We try to keep
our dependence on the federal government low; we have one of the lowest crime
rates in the country along with one of the highest livability rankings; there
is a mix of rural towns and small to moderate cities; a basic distrust of
large, national unions - particularly liberal, pro-federal government unions
such as the National Education Association - and, best of all, a "Live Free or
Die" attitude that keeps our government small, relatively low cost and
accessible to all citizens wishing to become involved in it.
It is just these attributes, bolstered by an active Libertarian Party that not
long ago received in excess of 5 percent of the popular vote in a gubernatorial
election, that has enticed The Free State Project to begin to think very
seriously about establishing its movement here.
That movement, according to the group's Web site, involves a plan to bring
20,000 or more "liberty oriented people" to the state where they will work
within the political system to reduce the size and scope of government.
Now that has to sound appealing to anyone who lives in New Hampshire, the site
of the first real battle of the Revolutionary War (the attack on Fort William
and Mary to secure arms for the rebel army), and where battles from the war for
independence are re-enacted yearly throughout the state. In fact, next weekend
the American Independence Museum will host such a re-enactment on its grounds
during a weekend celebration.
However, let's look a little deeper into what this group hopes to accomplish.
The Web site, www.freestateproject.org, actually defines the "liberty" these
Porcupines, as Free Staters call themselves, seek to enact in the state they
will flock to.
"Our members' philosophy is that being free and independent is a great way to
live and that government's role should be to defend individuals from force and
fraud."
Sounds like something anyone feeling the burden of skyrocketing property taxes
and increased federal intrusions into the business of the states through such
legislation as No Child Left Behind, the Homeland Security Act, The Patriot Act
and, now, the proposed Patriot II Act, would gravitate towards. However, there
are ramifications to the approach advocated by Free Staters that must be
considered as well.
Right or wrong, we have become dependent of a number of federal and
federal/state programs, in some cases, for our very existence. There are, of
course, Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, but also the Federal Highway
program that sends hundreds of millions of dollars to the state every year and
supplies hundreds of jobs to our citizens.
There are federal arts grants, education grants and housing grants. Housing for
the elderly and poor would virtually disappear in Portsmouth, for example,
without Section 8 money.
Our law enforcement agencies are just now getting around to developing a
communications system that will allow them to talk to each other thanks to a
federal grant, and federal and state grants have helped us to preserve the
colonial history the Porcupines are often so eager to talk about.
Matching grants that use state money to secure federal funds for our schools,
our businesses and nonprofits that serve our needy, may not be available if the
Free Staters have their way and the scope and size of government is reduced.
All this being said, we believe New Hampshire would benefit from an influx of
people who feel the way the Porcupines feel. It would generate interesting
discussions at all levels of government that could lead to innovations that
would save us all money, while increasing our individual liberties.
However, if we are to break our dependence on programs on which we have come to
rely there must be a feasible transition plan that will allow those who are
currently receiving needed services to continue to get them. It will be the job
of the rest of us to temper the enthusiasm of the Free Staters, if they
eventually decide on New Hampshire as their target state, with the compassion
of people who honestly care about one another.
More media articles about the FSP
These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by
The Free State Project,
a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship,
and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see
US Code Title 17,
Chapter 1, Section 107).
N.H. said a front-runner for libertarian splinter group
by Dean Abbott Staff Writer 07/13/03
Like most mothers, Michelle Dumas is concerned about the kind of society
her young daughter will grow up in. "I want to raise my daughter in a place
free from violent crime, where she will have access to high quality education,
and where personal responsibility is inherent in the culture," Dumas said.
Concern for the kind of society where her daughter will grow up is one of the
reasons why the 33-year-old Somersworth woman joined the Free State Project
after discovering the group on the Internet about 18 months ago.
According to the group's Web site, the Free State Project is a group dedicated
to "the effort to sign up 20,000 advocates of limited government to move to a
single state" with the goal of influencing public policy in that state. The
group hopes to concentrate the political efforts of its libertarian-leaning
constituency in a state with a small enough population where 20,000 activists
could make a difference.
And make a difference they could. University of New Hampshire Political Science
Instructor David Corbin said an influx of 20,000 focused activists could have a
tremendous impact on New Hampshire politics. "The world could be theirs in New
Hampshire," he said.
While the short list of options for where the group may be headed currently
contains 10 states, including Alaska, Delaware, Maine, Montana, Vermont and
Wyoming, New Hampshire is a front-runner to be chosen as the destination state
when the group votes in little more than a month, said Dumas, who serves the
group as a media coordinator.
If New Hampshire is chosen, some members would begin moving here immediately
though none are obligated to come for five years. Members of the group would
likely settle across the state since they will not be required to live in any
particular region.
The project's Web site describes the political position of many of its members.
"Most FSP members support policies such as the abolition of all income taxes,
elimination of regulatory bureaucracies, repeal of most gun control laws,
repeal of most drug prohibition laws, complete free trade, decentralization of
government, and wide-scale privatization."
The group began its drive to recruit members all of whom promise to move to a
particular state in September 2001, hoping to reach 5,000 commitments by
September 2004. The project's founders planned to hold a member vote to select
the target state once membership reached the 5,000 mark.
The group has beaten its goal date by more than a year. The number of people
who have joined so far is about 4,500. The group plans to hold its vote in on
Aug. 15.
"New Hampshire has seemed to be in the lead, or one of the states in the lead
since the beginning of the project, and there are good reasons for that," Dumas
said.
Dumas gave several reasons why New Hampshire is attractive to FSP members, but
first among these is New Hampshire's long-standing tradition of limited
government and self-reliance. "New Hampshire has a spirit of independence that
has survived 200-plus years. It's almost legendary" Dumas said.
UNH's Corbin echoes this observation. "A lot of people when they think of New
Hampshire, they think of 'Live Free or Die.' It's part of life here, it's on
our license plate, and it means something," he said.
Corbin said this political spirit stretches back to the beginnings of the
United States. "At the founding," he said, "some states incorporated a much
more centralized view of government and others a much more Jeffersonian (view),
... that emphasized decentralization. New Hampshire had a Jeffersonian
upbringing."
FSP members like Dumas are advocating within the group to persuade other voters
to select New Hampshire in the upcoming election. "New Hampshire is a state
where the values of small government and self-reliance are already primary in
the culture. Since what the Free State Project is seeking to do is to find a
state where these values are already inherent in the culture, New Hampshire
seems like the number one choice. I'm optimistic that New Hampshire will be the
choice. Very optimistic," she said.
Part of the efforts aimed at persuading FSP members to choose New Hampshire in
the August election involved a recent convention in Lancaster. "People came to
New Hampshire from all over the country. Many went around the state speaking to
individuals they came into contact with, and the reports that came back to me
were that nearly everyone was receptive to the Free State Project," Dumas said.
Jason Sorens, president of the Free State Project, said there are more tangible
reasons than just a tradition of independent spirit that might make New
Hampshire a good destination for the group. "Many think New Hampshire is best
for us because it has low taxes and a strong anti-tax movement, a wide range of
personal freedoms, a strong tradition of local democracy, and low dependence on
federal government subsidies," he said.
Sorens also said New Hampshire has attracted the attention of the Free State
Project because it has "resisted some trends in other states toward controlling
people's private lives. For example, New Hampshire has no motorcycle helmet law
and no seat belt laws for adults."
Many factors making New Hampshire an attractive place for Free Staters are
institutionalized in the way New Hampshire is governed. Dumas said the nature
of the New Hampshire Legislature is a good example; "We have a 400-member
Legislature. It offers the best representation in the nation. The government is
closer to the people. Even more important is that we pay our legislators only
$100 a year, so we end up with a government of the people."
Corbin said the state's Constitution reflects a strong view of individual
rights as well. "When you look at the New Hampshire state Constitution you see
it's divided into two major parts. The first part is a Bill of Rights. The
second part is the form of government. So, when the framers of the New
Hampshire Constitution framed it, they purposely began by stating what the
individual rights were before turning to a discussion of what form of
government would be necessary to secure those rights."
Sorens pointed to New Hampshire's practice of allowing political candidates to
run on two separate party lines as an attractive political tradition. This
practice, he said, "would allow us to have direct access to the Statehouse. We
could run people who are Libertarians and they could also get the Republican
nomination and pick up Republican voters and, of course, the same thing could
be done with Democrats."
New Hampshire's most well-known political event, its presidential primary, is
not a major draw for the Free Staters, according to Sorens. "Some members would
say it matters, but for most it is a positive, but relatively minor
consideration, because we're focused on state politics."
One issue sure to be contentious should FSP members' move to New Hampshire is
education. "Currently, our educational system is really a government monopoly.
What we would want to do is create more school choice, to return educational
decisions back to the hands of the parents," Dumas said.
FSP members have ranked the desirability of the 10 candidate states by a
variety of factors. One of those desirability factors concerns states with
fewer members in the National Education Association, a nationwide union and
professional association for educators. New Hampshire tied with Idaho for first
place in this category. Terry Shumaker, executive director of the New Hampshire
NEA, was puzzled by this fact. "I'm surprised by that statement." he said, "We
have over 14,000 active members in New Hampshire. We're the largest education
association in the state."
Sorens said ranking the state's by NEA membership was a way of trying to
measure how open the area would be to the group's efforts to introduce full
school choice. "The NEA has generally opposed any efforts toward educational
choice or competition, so a state with a higher NEA membership would be less
fruitful ground for those policies" he said.
Shumaker said the New Hampshire NEA "doesn't necessarily oppose it (school
choice) so long as the field is level." A level playing field, Shumaker said,
means that "if public money is going to go to a school, then the same
requirements should be placed upon any school receiving public funds," he said.
Sorens claimed introducing full educational competition and choice would "lead
to higher quality schools at lower costs just as other markets are better off
when they are freed from government monopoly control."
If New Hampshire is chosen as the destination state for Free State Project
members, some members have pledged to move here immediately, though none would
be obligated to move here for five years. Consequently, quality of life
projections have been important to the group. "New Hampshire has a very strong
job market, and areas of New Hampshire have affordable real estate. I don't
have any worries about being able to assimilate into New Hampshire both
economically and culturally" Sorens said.
Dumas indicated that Free Staters moving to New Hampshire could benefit the
state. "It is my impression," she said, "that people in the Free State Project
tend to be overwhelmingly entrepreneurial, so they would be moving here and
creating new opportunities and jobs."
If New Hampshire should be chosen by the Free State Project and even if all
20,000 members should move to the state, Corbin wonders how effective they
would be. "Libertarian thought rests on the idea of 'leave me alone'" he said.
"When you get a bunch of those people together, how do you get them organized?"
Corbin says the activist's ability to organize is even more important than
their numbers. "To say 20,000 people move to the state and the game is over, I
think, is incorrect, but if 20,000 move to the state with means to support the
activities you need to do in politics, they could have a tremendous impact," he
said.
When asked about what the official response from the state would be should FSP
members choose New Hampshire and begin moving here, Chris Reid, a staff member
for Governor Craig Benson said "As long as they believe in the rule of law, I
can't imagine the governor being opposed to anybody moving to New Hampshire
because of their political beliefs. The sign at the border say 'Welcome' and we
mean it."
Because FSP's plans are not yet firm, some New Hampshire members, though hoping
to stay put, are preparing to move should another state be chosen. Dover member
George Reich, 45, said "I think freedom is more important than living in a
particular state. I would be willing to move to another state to be a part of
this."
More media articles about the FSP
These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by
The Free State Project,
a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship,
and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see
US Code Title 17,
Chapter 1, Section 107).
Is The Free State New Hampshire?
by The Hunter 06/26/03
I don't remember any more exactly when I first heard about
The Free State Project, though
I am pretty sure it was on the
Liberty Round Table "discussions"
mailing list. Founder Jason Sorens was floating the idea around, and it
justifiably caused a lot of excitement in the Freedom movement. The whole idea
has put me personally in a bit of an ethical dilemma, and made me seriously
rethink my long-term plans. This past weekend I attended the
Escape To New Hampshire
program presented by the Welcome
to the Granite State Committee of the
Libertarian Party of New Hampshire. The "porcupines" of the Free State
Project have convinced me that I'm already living in the state that has the
best overall climate for freedom in the entire nation. Hence the dilemma.
You see, six years ago I was living in Massachusetts, better known in these
parts as The People's Socialist Commonwealth. The worst part, no less, right in
the middle of Boston. A nice enough city I suppose if you go in for
civilization, socialism, and neighbors who can't conceive of minding their own
business. Give me the woods and mountains any time; I'll leave Boston for the
rats and collectivists. One night I just could not take it any more, and I
packed up, dodged the commissars, wriggled under the barbed wire fences,
strangled a guard dog, swam the river, and escaped to the "Live Free or Die"
state. Well, all right, it wasn't quite that dramatic, but I have an
artistic license and I know how to use it.
At the time, I saw this as a temporary measure until I could rearrange my life
to move out west where you could really be free. Montana or Wyoming, probably,
I have always loved the Rockies and spent as much time as I could hiking and
riding around in them. Then along comes this sonuvagun Jason Sorens.
I eagerly poured over his data on the relative merits of the low-population
states for this notion of 20,000 dedicated freedom lovers pledging to move to
one of them together. The case he presented gave me great pause for thought.
The more I looked at his hard numbers, and thought about my own experiences
living here, the more I realized that you really couldn't find a better place
to live free than New Hampshire. Much as I love the American West, and
especially the mountain states like Wyoming and Montana, I've spent enough time
in them over the years to have a feel for the accuracy of some of what the
FSP's data reveal.
I have been going over the "Why New
Hampshire" information that the
Welcome to the Granite State
Committee has made available with a fine-tooth comb. I learned a lot I did
not know about the state I now call home, and found that the case is even
stronger than I had come to believe. That was a large part of the reason I
went up to Lancaster last weekend to see their presentation. I wanted both to
hear the case they would present, and put in my two cents worth independently
agreeing with their assessment.
There is no point in going over the case in detail here, because the Granite
State "porcupines" lay out the case so well on their web page. I was especially
taken with their 101
Reasons to Vote for New Hampshire, well worth a read even if you are not
interested in getting involved in the Free State Project. The speakers at the
"Escape" were just as informative. It was even more fun to sit around a
campfire and bat ideas back and forth. There is even still time to get in on
the fun, because they still have some events scheduled for the last weekend of
June.
The ethical dilemma, you ask? I agree 100 per cent with the goals of the Free
State Project. I think that this is probably the single most important thing
happening in the Freedom movement right now. Sometime this fall the 5000th
member will pledge to join the migration, and an historic vote will take place
to choose their destination. Here's my problem: I already live in the state I
think they should choose. To me at least, it seems rather unethical to join and
take part in the vote after they have convinced me that I really would rather
not move. I do really hope New Hampshire wins, though. We "Live Free or Die"
sorts are really looking forward to a bunch of new freedom loving
neighbors.
Hunter's Two Hundred Thirty-Third Rule: Nobody is going to give
freedom to you, you have to want it enough to take it.
More media articles about the FSP
These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by
The Free State Project,
a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship,
and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see
US Code Title 17,
Chapter 1, Section 107).
Free State Project vote set for August
by Nadia White Star-Tribune staff writer 07/08/03
Liberty-minded activists will choose which sparsely-populated state will be the
focus of their collective political might in a vote beginning in August.
Members of the Free State Project will have until Sept. 8 to vote on which of
10 states they would like to move to in order to advocate for limited
government. Wyoming and New Hampshire are top contenders in the effort.
The Free State Project is an effort to sign up 20,000 advocates of limited
government to move to a single state in which they can incrementally reduce the
reach of government. That effort passed the 4,000-member mark earlier in June,
prompting organizers to set a vote date.
The deadline to sign up to participate in the vote is Aug. 15, by which time
the FSP should have more than 5,000 members, according to the group's
projections. The deadline for members to return their ballots is Sept. 8, and
the selected state will be announced on Sept. 15, according to a press release
from Jason Sorens, the Yale University doctoral student who founded and leads
the effort.
Tom Parker, a Louisville, Colo., resident who serves as the group's liaison to
Wyoming, said the movement is a reaction to the current government climate.
"In terms of liberty, we see things drifting away with the latest moves like
the USA Patriot Act, and the various wars, now Liberia, we feel our government
is not playing by the rules of the Constitution so we're hoping to change
things," Parker said. "By concentrating our numbers in one state we're hoping
to have more influence and move things more toward liberty."
Eligible voters will be able to choose from among Alaska, Delaware, Idaho,
Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and
Wyoming. Once the group reaches 20,000 commitments, members have five years in
which to move to the chosen state. Some members have already indicated that
they will move as soon as the state is chosen, Parker said.
Dennis Brossman, a Wyoming Libertarian, said the project is very appealing.
" I am tempted by the project even if Alaska or Vermont were to try it. I
prefer Wyoming, the climate and terrain and being in the heart of the 48
states, but the freedom experiment is very alluring to me," Brossman said. "
I'd be willing to move to Alaska."
Brossman said the idea of newcomers changing the way things are done in Wyoming
is nothing new.
"I think it's done in other realms, but not so openly and honestly," he said.
"For example, in Lander and Jackson in the last 10, 15 years, we've had a large
number of environmentalists move in and they heavily affect the policy in these
areas."
He said he thinks the plan has a shot: "I think it's something that would be
workable and doable. I don't think it's a pipe dream."
The Free State Project posts additional information on its Web site, (http://www.freestateproject.org).
More media articles about the FSP
These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by
The Free State Project,
a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship,
and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see
US Code Title 17,
Chapter 1, Section 107).
'Free Staters' should bypass Granite State
Editorial 06/24/03
KEY POINTS
BACKGROUND: A group of out-of-state Libertarians is considering New Hampshire
as a place to move en masse to establish a Free State.
CONCLUSION: Libertarians are welcome to visit but they ought to pick another
state for their 'small government' project.
A group of people wishing to launch a political movement in a small state
looked over New Hampshire during the weekend as a possible site for the
endeavor.
According to press reports, Libertarians from different parts of the country
visited the state as part of their plan to establish a Free State Project.
Ultimately, these Libertarians want to have 20,000 followers move to a state
and get politically involved to reduce the size of its government.
Thanks, but no thanks. Let the Libertarians pick Idaho or Wyoming or even
Alaska for their project. New Hampshire already has its fair share of small
government advocates.
And in case the visiting Libertarians hadn't noticed, New Hampshire is already
trying to downsize its government. It does so every time it faces a budget
crunch, as it does this year.
Gov. Craig Benson is at odds with members of the Legislature over budget
increases. With 424 members, the New Hampshire Legislature is all about grass
roots in action. Republicans who dominate the state and its government are
decidedly of the conservative, keep-government-simple type. Yet, they have a
hard time agreeing about a new two-year budget.
Keeping the budget numbers down proves a difficult process. It's about setting
priorities, and setting a balance between needs and revenue, overlaid with
differing points of view about the role of government.
The Free Staters hope that by 2006 some 20,000 Libertarians will begin moving
to the state selected for the project. The state must be small in population
and of conservative bent so that their voices will be heard and their influence
felt.
Libertarians do run for public office in New Hampshire and a few have been
elected to the Legislature, though not in the 2002 election. Libertarians want
government to provide only minimal services, such as police, courts, military
defense and roads. Most everything else would be left to charities or private
endeavor.
The small government they talk about is utopia, but the notion appeals to the
highly individualistic and the successful self-starters.
However, society becomes more complex as communities grow and the population
increases. Without a well-functioning government, life could degenerate into a
free for all. (Check out Iraq or Afghanistan, for example.)
From our perspective, life under the Free Staters has no appeal. But
Libertarians are welcome to visit New Hampshire any time. We're not
inhospitable, we're just wary of their quixotic politics.
To respond to this editorial
click here. Be sure to include contact information if you would like your
letter to appear as a letter to the editor.
More media articles about the FSP
These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by
The Free State Project,
a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship,
and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see
US Code Title 17,
Chapter 1, Section 107).
Libertarians checking out N.H.
by Associated Press 06/24/03
LANCASTER, N.H. (AP) A group of Libertarians is in New Hampshire this
week to see if the state might make a good home for a new national movement.
It's called the Free State Project and the idea is to move 20,000 followers to
one state, where they'll work toward reducing the size of government.
Project Vice President Elizabeth McKinstry says they're just trying to get a
bunch of people who think the same way, in the same place, and see what
happens.
The group is looking for a small state that tends toward fiscal conservatism
and social liberalism.
When they find it, group members will run for state offices on a traditional
Libertarian platform: no gun-control laws, elimination of taxes and reduction
in government spending.
New Hampshire and Wyoming are the strongest contenders among ten states being
checked out.
More media articles about the FSP
These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by
The Free State Project,
a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship,
and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see
US Code Title 17,
Chapter 1, Section 107).