IO withdraws from FSP

Original article:	proliberty.com/observer/20030714.htm
Date:	07/23/03
Title:	IO withdraws from Free State Project
Author:	Don Harkins
Publication:	Idaho Observer

---

IO withdraws from Free State Project

A series of events have taken place which has caused The Idaho Observer to adopt a fall-back position regarding its endorsement of and pledge to participate in the Free State Project (FSP).

The FSP is the brainchild of Jason Sorens, who recently earned a Ph.D in political science at Yale and is will be a lecturer for Yale's Political Science Department this coming school year.

The IO has been in support of the FSP since learning of it last fall. Staff writer Hari Heath dedicated his monthly column to an analysis of why the FSP ought to pick Idaho from among the 10 states in the running for being chosen as the first "free state" (The IO, Nov., 2002). The IO also attended the Libertarian Party of Montana's Grand Western Conference last Memorial Day weekend because the conference was centered around discussion about the FSP.

Sorens attended the Missoula conference, as did Sierra Times Editor J.J. Johnson and his wife Nancy Lord Johnson, Las Vegas Review-Journal Editorial Page Editor Vin Suprynowicz and author Clair Wolfe.

The conference was excellent (as reported last month by Richard Rieben). Sorens was also a very nice person whose interest in the FSP was supported by the thesis he wrote to earn his Ph.D -- secession movements in the 20th century.

Issues began to arise when Lanny Messinger, a close friend of us here at The IO, began to question some things regarding the inner workings of FSP. He determined that it is a foregone conclusion New Hampshire will be the free state chosen. He also discovered that the FSP will make the decision internally.

Messinger was appalled. The FSP email discussion group got quite heated and resulted in Messinger proposing that there be an FSP east and an FSP west. Additional chat room discussion illuminated an interesting dilemma: Free staters east and free staters out west have significantly different concepts of freedom.

Messinger seceded from the FSP and is proposing a free county project with a motto, "Liberty after the next election," as opposed to "Liberty in our lifetime."

Questions have arisen regarding the significance of Sorens' employment with Yale's Pol Sci department, particularly because of its self-stated objectives for the direction of world government.

Sorens' explanations for some of these concerns have been lucid and in keeping with his decent character. In an email exchange we agreed that some valid issues were brought to light.

At this time, The IO is withdrawing from FSP as a pledged participant. We plan to report FSP developments as they come our way and report the progress of the Free County Project as well.

This last month has illuminated some key issues that may foreshadow the project's potential for failure; it also showed us what it will take to help it succeed. Stay tuned.

---

More media articles about the FSP

These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by The Free State Project, a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship, and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see US Code Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 107).

The Grand Western Conference Report

Original article:	www.sierratimes.com/03/05/27/ar_fsp_2.htm
Date:	05/27/03
Title:	The Grand Western Conference Report
Author:	Ben F. Irvin
Publication:	Sierra Times

---

The Grand Western Conference Report

By Ben F. Irvin • 05/27/03

The most significant libertarian event of the year has just concluded in Missoula, Montana (May 24 and 25). Almost two hundred freedom seekers from around the nation and Alberta attended.

Fantastic presentations were given by the main presenters: J.J. Johnson, Nancy Johnson, Senator Jerry O'Neil, Jason Sorens, Vin Suprynowicz, and Claire Wolfe. All the presenters, save Jason (being neutral) agreed that liberty has the best chance surviving and expanding in the West. A couple of the main speakers indicated that freedom as sought by the FSP can only be procured in the West. A consistent point emphasized by the speakers was the idea that liberty needs elbow room to expand, and that the tiny Seaboarder states lack both the space and motivation for freedom to flourish. Jason seemed impressed by the attendance and enthusiasm of the gathered.

The Missoulian (Montana's second largest newspaper) and the Missoula Independent covered the event. The Montana Television Network and KPVI television from Pocatello, Idaho videoed parts of the event (video tapes were made of all activities by the MTLP).

State panel discussions were given by Idaho, Montana, South Dakota and Wyoming. In the final session on Sunday, the four Western state panels answered questions by participants. To demonstrate Instant Runoff Voting (another type of ranked choice voting called "Condorset's Method" will be used to select the free state), all porcupines (that's what FSP folks call themselves) were asked to gather around the table of the state they desire to be the free state. In the first round, South Dakota was eliminated and its supporters were asked to select their second choice. In the second round, Wyoming ended up with the short stick. A third round was not done as even if all of Wyoming's supporters moved to the Idaho table, Montana still had a majority. Indeed, Montana almost had a majority in the first round. It was observed that all of the presenters, save one (who was in the lobby in deep discussion) voted for Montana.

It was difficult to get many of the GWC participants motel/hotel rooms; however, most finally got accommodations. Nearly a dozen porcupines camped out. Most camped on Gary Marbut's ranch just a few miles north of Missoula. Gary was nice enough to provide free lodging for Jason. Both Gary and I supplied transportation for Jason.

A surprise at the GWC (Montana's winning was expected) was the six or seven Albertans that drove down to attend. Jim Turnbull explained in informal gatherings the Alberta plan for independence and liberty. It seemed to most that the Albertan political philosophy was compatible with that of most porcupines. Towards the end of the GWC three young Albertans told the Montana table that they intended to move to Montana regardless of which state becomes the free state and whether or not Alberta gains independence.

It took the work and effort of many people to make the GWC the libertarian event of the year. Special appreciation should be given to Mike Fellows (MTLP Chair), Gary Marbut, Andy Lochridge, and Mykl Meagher. Numerous others, too many to list, contributed heavily to the success of the Grand Western Conference.

I should also mention that my youngest son and I did manage to get Jason away from Missoula just long enough to see the National Bison Range and a panoramic view of the Mission Mountains and Flathead Valley.

---

More media articles about the FSP

These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by The Free State Project, a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship, and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see US Code Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 107).

Libertarians consider state for influx

Original article:	www.spokesmanreview.com/news-story.asp ?date=040603&ID=s1331833
Date:	4/6/03
Title:	Libertarians consider state for influx
Author:	Trinity Hartman
Publication:	Spokesman-Review

---

Libertarians consider state for influx

By Trinity Hartman – Staff writer • 4/6/03

Coeur d'Alene _ The state of Idaho has made Libertarians' top 10 list.

Idaho would be well-suited for an influx of liberty-minded folks who would move here and re-make the state in their image, according to the Free State Project.

The Free State Project plans to choose one of 10 states and then have members move there en masse. With 20,000 new residents in a state like Idaho, Libertarians could change state politics, said Elizabeth McKinstry, vice president of the Free State Project and a Michigan resident.

McKinstry made a stop in North Idaho on Saturday to rally support for the idea. She spoke to about 20 people at North Idaho College.

McKinstry's vision of a free state would be one with less government, lower taxes and strong support for individual liberties.

Government intrusion has made living in all states a burden, McKinstry said.

"In our lifetime, we want a society where we can (raise a family) without government involvement," she said.

The Saturday event was organized by Libertarians in the region and featured a variety of other speakers, including John Beck, an economics professor from Gonzaga University.

Idaho, Montana and Wyoming all made the list of 10 potential "free states," chosen for their sparse populations and for having residents that are fiercely independent and committed to individual liberty, McKinstry said.

"Twenty thousand people influencing friends and neighbors can really turn the tide in any of those states," McKinstry said.

When a man in the audience asked whether Idaho was at the top of the list, McKinstry refused to say.

"I would say Idaho is a strong contender. Certainly it's in the top half, from what I hear from members," she said.

The Libertarian parties in New Hampshire and Maine, two of the states under consideration, have endorsed the movement and are lobbying the Free State Project to choose them, according to a recent article in the Baltimore Sun.

So far, the Free State Project says 3,000 people have signed on. The idea is that once the number reaches 5,000, participants will vote for one of 10 states.

The group's hope is that eventually 20,000 or more Libertarians will move to the chosen state. Once they become a large enough voting bloc, they would work within the political system to reduce the size and scope of government.

The Free State Project doesn't have a specific agenda for how the chosen state would operate, McKinstry said.

The movement was started by Jason Sorens, a doctoral student at Yale, in 2001. It's gained much of its momentum on the Internet. McKinstry, with her plastic hipster glasses and urban look, is young as are many of the fellow Free-Staters.

There are a lot of techies, telecommuters and small business owners who have signed on, McKinstry said.

Rob Chase, who was at the event promoting his Columbia Free State idea, which involves breaking Eastern Washington away from the west side of the state, said he was impressed by the youthful pioneer spirit of the Free State Project.

"I think we're at the beginning of something really big," Chase said.

*Trinity Hartman can be reached at (509) 927-2164 or by e-mail at trinityh@spokesman.com.

---

More media articles about the FSP

These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by The Free State Project, a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship, and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see US Code Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 107).

The Free State Project: A Project for Idaho

Original article:	proliberty.com/observer/20021103.htm
Date:	11/03/02
Title:	The Free State Project: A Project for Idaho
Author:	Hari Heath
Publication:	Idaho Observer

---

The Free State Project: A Project for Idaho

By Hari Heath • 11/03/02

What is a "free state?" Whatever a free state is, it's certainly not being served and protected by regimes posing as constitutionally authorized state and federal governments. Our current government has all the trappings of a police state; they are managed through emergency proclamations, executive orders, bureaucratic mandates and judicial fiat. We are further whipped into a frenzy by the propagandists of terror who have been given unconscionable and unconstitutional license by the corporately purchased buffoons in the legislative branch. Our nation no longer bears any real resemblance to the government our founders intended.

From any direction you look at it, ethically, constitutionally, economically or politically, the regimes posing as our state and federal governments are bankrupt. A "free state?" Not hardly.

Many people talk about freedom, but few individuals try to do something about it. Regime change now has become a popular concept, but how? Anyone who has tried to organize even a local group to promote freedom issues will understand the impossible task of weaning 280 million American souls off the nipples of socialism and moving them toward liberty. The federal reptile with its countless bureaucratic tentacles, gnashing law enforcement fangs and seemingly limitless mammary secretions is just too much beast to tangle with.

So start small. Just such a "Free State Project" has already begun. Conceived in July of 2001 and organized by September, the Free State Project (FSP) already has over 1400 committed members. Under the motto of "Liberty in our Lifetime" and under the seal of the green porcupine, the FSP is for people who, "don't want to wait decades for most citizens in the U. S. to realize the nanny state is an insult to their dignity."

How?

"The Free State Project is a plan in which 20,000 or more liberty-oriented people will move to a single state of the U. S. to secure there a free society. We will accomplish this by first reforming state law, opting out of federal mandates and, finally, negotiating directly with the federal government for appropriate political autonomy. We will be a community of freedom-loving individuals and families, and create a shining example of liberty for the rest of the nation and the world."

A stellar idea, but what are the plans to accomplish this? Once the membership reaches 5,000, the state will be chosen and that is where the free-staters will move. The FSP is doing extensive research on all the candidate states. Many criteria are being considered with 10 states in the running: Alaska, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Vermont, Delaware, Maine, New Hampshire, South Dakota and Wyoming.

Criteria for a Free State

States with a population of approximately 1.2 million or less are being considered as viable locations for 20,000 liberty activists to infiltrate existing government and create a free state. The FSP's numbers are based on history and a statistical analysis of other independent party politics, such as the Parti Quebecois (PQ). The PQ began in 1967 as a coalition 3rd party that was formed from dissident Liberal Party members and smaller pro-independence parties. With only one out of every 62 citizens paid PQ party members, the PQ achieved a parliamentary majority nine years after it formed.

The FSP is specifically not affiliated with any political party, but rather a coalition of "libertarians, classical liberals, constitutionalists and others who believe that, at a maximum, the role of civil government should be the protection of citizens' rights to life, liberty and property."

The FSP welcomes any liberty-oriented people. The FSP has adopted the porcupine as its "don't-tread-on-me" mascot.

The primary goal is to first achieve a majority in the legislature and then work towards filling the other branches of government. Just as many formerly "democratic" politicians in Idaho have infiltrated and became "republicans" to join with the party in power, FSP members can infiltrate the two dominant parties and take them over or support the various 3rd parties and raise them to greater political standing. Are there 20,000 republican and democratic activists in Idaho now? Imagine what 20,000 FSP members, dedicated to liberty, could do to the dominant parties at the local and state level.

Other considerations for a state where a free economy and society will be viable include the current funding levels of the republican and democratic parties; the native political culture and its orientation towards liberty; the economic freedom index; gun control and home schooling laws. A state with a coastline and ports or a border with Canada are considered more viable for "free-market policies" than landlocked states. There is even a criteria for the "lazy" factor -- the percentage of the population that is employed by federal, state and local governments.

And there is a many-faceted consideration generally falling under the term "quality of life." Climate, projected jobs growth, crime rates, per capita income relative to the cost of living, and population density are given a more subjective evaluation.

Federal Equations

The amount of federal land ownership in a state is being considered for both positive and negative factors. "More federal land ownership might mean an excuse for federal meddling in the state, but it could also mean a legitimate grievance for the state's citizens."

Federal dependence, particularly whether a state receives more or less federal funding than it pays in federal taxes, is also factor being given important consideration. States that get more federal handouts than they pay for are likely to be harder to wean from federal socialism.

The federal government claims to own two-thirds of Idaho and there are considerable grounds for Idaho citizens to have a legitimate grievance. Especially when history, the current lethargic federal management schemes and the constitutional facts of life are considered. The federal Constitution prohibits the federal government from owning any lands within a state except for certain military purposes and other needful buildings. The Idaho Constitution conveyed all property of the Idaho territory to the new state upon admission to the union. But unconstitutional Presidential Proclamations usurped much of the Idaho public lands soon after it became a state (see The Big Lie, http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20010802.htm)

Why doesn't Idaho resume management of the public lands fraudulently held by the federal government? Because the current political powers in Idaho don't want to rock the boat and risk losing their federal handouts. What would be the result if Free State activists assumed a majority position in state government and chose to give up all the federal handouts (which they plan to do anyway) and reassumed the two-thirds of Idaho that was unconstitutionally "taken?"

Resources?

One criteria that appears to be missing from the FSP's evaluation of the states is resources. Especially natural ones. How can a state be independent and self reliant without the means to do so? The resource oversight is understandable, since many of the FSP's founders are from the eastern states, where resources are more likely to be acquired in commerce than by development.

The relative qualities and quantities of each prospective state's resources appears to have escaped the FSP's consideration. The western states typically have a much greater quantity and diversity of resources than the eastern states and have populations of people who know what to do with them.

Ultimately, a Choice

The Free Staters, or porcupines as they call themselves, will eventually have an election to choose a state. Instead of the conventional one person, one vote election, the FSP will give each member 10 votes to cast all for one state or divide among several different states. The current poll on the FSP's web site gives the following results:

New Hampshire 26%; Montana 14%; Wyoming 11%; Delaware 10%; Maine 8%; Alaska 8%; Idaho 8%; Vermont 6%; North Dakota 3%; South Dakota 25%.

FSP members will vote for a state when there are 5,000 FSP members and within three years from the beginning of the project or the effort will disband.

A Free State for Idaho?

Idaho is already under consideration to become the Free State. Under various criteria and popular choice, Idaho falls somewhere near the middle of the pack under most criteria. Idaho has more diverse opportunities than most of the other states in contention. Idaho has moderate climates, a pre-existing "liberty" culture, varied geography and economic opportunities and a quality of life that can be enjoyed from remote wilderness settings to modern, urban environments.

Formerly known as the gem state, Idaho has abundant gems, precious and industrial metals and minerals. Mining was one of the first post-European settlement activities.

Many of Idaho's native peoples have established tribal gaming enterprises. The proceeds enhance their tribal interests and provide additional revenue for schools and other infrastructures. Idaho native populations might be naturally inclined to support the FSP.

Agriculture is common throughout Idaho and is a major component of the Idaho economy.

Idaho has supplied a wide variety of forest products for well over a century. We also have wilderness areas nearly the size of New Hampshire and other forest lands. With 20,000 activists to help wean us from federal hand-outs and work to reassume ownership of Idaho's federally-occupied public lands, prospects could be good for Idahoans. An accountable state government and the teeth of our current State Constitution's corporations article, could provide excellent management of our public lands while preventing some of the past corporate abuses of Idaho's resources.

Recreation has become dominant in many areas that were formerly timber and mining areas. White-water rafting, skiing, snowmobiling, hunting, fishing, boating and hiking are now major parts of the Idaho economy and common Idaho pastimes.

Idaho, especially once you step out of the Boise beltway (where the socialists in office "work" and play), is one of America's few remaining liberty cultures. Those who have been here a generation or more are likely to have come from that independent pioneer stock. More recent migrations have seen many who wanted to get away from the big city only to bring it all with them. So Idaho now has a mix of urban/suburban comfortable living and rugged, rural lifestyle opportunities.

Idaho Politics?

Politically, Idaho has been dominated by Republicans for years. There are many reasons for this. Generally, Idaho is an independent, conservative and individualistic society. Traditionally north Idaho is the main refuge for Democrats. Those Democrats, however, tend to behave somewhat like Republicans. On the other hand, many "Democrats" joined the Republican party some time ago so they could get elected. So some of our Republicans tend to behave like Democrats.

The libertarians of Northern Idaho fielded more candidates this year than the Democrats did and several have a decent chance of winning, especially after the legislature overturned the people's initiative for term limits last year. Incumbents who voted to repeal term limits may get the boot.

Given the weak standing of the nearly DOA Democratic party, it would not take a monumental effort for the Libertarians to become the second most powerful party. That would provide the opportunity to inject Libertarian issues into the Idaho political debate. Most Idahoans are unfamiliar with the Libertarian platform. There are a lot of Libertarians in Idaho that just don't know it yet. The Constitution party has also made a good showing this year, with good potential for improvement.

If the FSP moves to Idaho, a "Liberty Party" or coalition of Libertarians, Constitution Party members and free-thinking Republicans could be put together to develop some in-state political clout and challenge Idaho's Republican guard.

Twenty-thousand liberty activists could go a long way in Idaho. Idaho uses the caucus system. In some of the smaller counties, it is not inconceivable for 10 or 20 "activists" to show up at either the Republican or Democratic caucus,' take over, run their own candidates, and knock incumbents and conventional candidates down to write-in status.

The Free State Project: A Project for Idaho

An unintended result of so many activists moving to a state with a liberty agenda would be the eventual exodus-out of dyed-in-the wool socialists. Those who want to get their good life from the taxes of others will have to move to greener pastures once the "bennies" dry up.

The wheels of socialism have been turning in Idaho like anywhere else in modern America. There will be resistance from the "there-otta-be-a-law" politicians currently in power. And the hordes of agency employees will not go away with out a fight.

Guns?

Guns are a traditional component of Idaho culture. Concealed carry permits are easy to get as long as you provide fingerprints and pass a federal background check. Only convicted felons, drug addicts and the mentally infirm can be denied a concealed carry permit in Idaho. Permit holders are excluded from the federal waiting period and background checks for gun purchases. State law allows concealed carry without a permit when you are not in a vehicle or an incorporated town.

Alternative Schooling?

Home schooling is common in Idaho with some reasonable cooperation between public schools and home schoolers on some extra-curricular activities. Many home schoolers teach their children completely without government involvement. Charter schools began a few years ago in Idaho, in what is essentially a state-funded private school program. Time will tell how "private" charter schools can remain on public funds.

Climate and Geography

Idaho has a wide variety of climates, terrain and regions. Central Idaho is largely rugged wilderness and mountains that separate the other regions of Idaho. Mostly small towns and rural settings dominate central Idaho. Climate varies with the elevation from high country covered with snow until July, to river bottoms and canyons that provide good gardening opportunities.

Northern Idaho is a mix of mountains, valleys and prairies. Warm summers and moderate winters are common at the lower elevations. Climate is influenced more often by coastal weather than the central prairies. Couer d'Alene is the major city in North Idaho, which is dotted with many medium to smaller towns.

Southwestern Idaho contains the majority of Idaho's population and its political, economic and industrial base. The Treasure Valley around the greater Boise area has a climate with hot summers and moderate winters. Urban and suburban development along the Snake River is surrounded by active agricultural production.

Eastern Idaho is a mix of high desert, mountains and agriculturally developed prairies. Several eastern cities provide urban living opportunities, with many medium to small communities scattered across the mostly open terrain.

Idaho provides a vast array of rural living opportunities. High mountains, river valleys and canyons, the southern and eastern desert areas, the prairies and plains, offer many diverse relocation choices for the "porcupines" of the FSP.

Economic Opportunities?

Idaho ranks number one on the FSP's projected jobs growth analysis and their economic freedom index. Contrary to the FSP's listing, Idaho does have a port in Lewiston where many commercial products are barged up and down the Snake and Columbia Rivers. Rail service is available throughout Idaho. Idaho shares a short border with Canada.

The Case for Idaho

Consider the alternatives. If you're going to live somewhere, climate is important. It's easy to theorize about the relative importance of climate from an office in Florida or a house in California. How many FSP porcupines want to hole up in Wyoming or the Dakotas for a high-plains winter? How many would be able to brave a harsh Alaskan winter and still be there in the spring? FSP meetings may not be all that well attended come February.

If you want to attract a following it needs to be attractive for the long haul. A free state is not a one-year project. A cool but not too cold Idaho canyon like the Clearwater, the Snake or the Salmon might be more preferable in January than say, Bismarck, North Dakota.

And just what is the resource base of say, New Hampshire? How do free-staters plan to build a free-market export economy? Maple Syrup and hardwood flooring? Idaho already has diverse and productive resources in greater quantity than all the eastern state candidates combined. It also has the best economic prognosis according to the FSP's own data.

The federal Constitution only authorizes federal ownership of lands within a state for four specific types of military purposes and other needful buildings. Once this fact becomes more widely known, and the federal usurpation of two-thirds of Idaho is properly challenged by 20,000 porcupines (and a few more locals), we can "finally negotiate directly with the federal government for appropriate political autonomy." That's a lot of Idaho to build a free state with.

The political climate of Idaho is ripe for positive change. The republican majority in the legislature has upset much of the electorate by repealing a thrice passed term limits law. The democrats are nearly DOA, and have been for years. The libertarians have made record progress and the Constitution Party is alive and well. That doesn't mean there aren't also a lot of lawyers, lobbyists and socialists, eager to maintain business as usual.

Let's get real. How many liberty-loving westerners would actually cross the Mississippi and live? Easterners may like it there, but I don't think too many westerners could call it home -- even if we were the government. I've never been there, but I'll bet "rural" Vermont looks a lot more like "suburban" Idaho with deciduous trees. Size matters. And population density too.

Easterners and westerners are two different breeds of people. Are there only 20,000 liberty-oriented activists left in America? Eastern porcupines would certainly be welcome out west, but what about a free state east and a free state west? We could alternate our annual free state convention and compare notes.

In all fairness there are a lot of good things that can be said about Montana as a choice for the FSP. Wyoming? Nevada? Maybe. But Idaho, formerly known as the gem state, Idaho and its famous potatoes legislature pushing to be known as the "tolerance" state, would make a great free state. I like it already, Idaho, "The Free State."

***

Note to Marylanders: Maryland has been known as "The Free State" since the nineteen twenties, when Baltimore Sun editor Hamilton Owens proposed seceding from the federal union rather than going along with Prohibition.

Things change however, and from here in the Western States Maryland looks like nothing more than an appendage of the District of Columbia: bedroom communities and office parks supporting federal leechism.

Should Maryland still be called "The Free State" or should the mantle pass to another displaying the appropriate fruits?

To borrow from Benjamin Franklin, the moniker is yours "if you can keep it."

Idahoans and other porcupine types can register their vote in the FSP's poll at:

www.freestateproject.org

---

More media articles about the FSP

These media articles are maintained on a non-commercial basis by The Free State Project, a non-profit organization, for historical, educational, scholarship, and research purposes. (For information regarding "Fair Use", see US Code Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 107).

State Report ID 2: A Free State for Idaho

A Free State for Idaho: A Second Report from Idaho

by Hari Heath

Idaho is under consideration to become the Free State. Why should Idaho become the Free State? Under various criteria established by the FSP, Idaho falls somewhere near the middle to the front of the pack. Idaho has more diverse opportunities than most of the other states in contention. Idaho has a moderate climate, a pre-existing "liberty" culture, varied geography and economic opportunities, and a quality of life that can be enjoyed across the spectrum, from remote wilderness settings to modern, urban environments.

Idaho, especially once you step out of the Boise beltway (where the current socialists in office "work" and play), is one of America's few remaining liberty cultures. Those who have been here a generation or more are likely to have come from that independent pioneer or native stock.

Recent migrations have seen many move to Idaho who wanted to get away from the more "developed" states. Some have blended into Idaho culture and some have brought their former lifestyles with them. Idaho now has a mix of comfortable living in urban/suburban settings and rural lifestyle opportunities.

Idaho Politics

Politically, Republicans have dominated Idaho for years. There are many reasons for this. Generally, Idaho is an independent, conservative, and individualistic society. Traditionally north Idaho is the main refuge for Democrats. Those Democrats, however, often tend to behave like Republicans. On the other hand, many "Democrats" joined the Republican Party some time ago so they could get elected. So some of our Republicans tend to behave like Democrats.

The Libertarians of Northern Idaho fielded more candidates this year than the Democrats did. Given the weak standing of the nearly DOA Democratic Party, it would not take a monumental effort for the Libertarians to become the second most powerful party. That would provide the opportunity to inject Libertarian issues into the Idaho political debate.

Most Idahoans are unfamiliar with the Libertarian platform. There are a lot of Libertarians in Idaho that just don't know it yet. The Constitution Party has also made a good showing this year, with potential for improvement.

If the FSP moves to Idaho, a "Liberty Party" or coalition of Libertarians, Constitution Party members, and free-thinking Republicans could be put together to develop some in-state political clout and challenge Idaho's Republican guard.

Twenty-thousand liberty activists could go a long way in Idaho. There aren't 20,000 republican and democratic activists in Idaho now. Idaho uses the caucus system. In some of the less populated counties, it would not be inconceivable for 10 or 20 "activists" to show up at either the Republican or Democratic caucus, take it over, run their own candidates, and knock incumbents and conventional candidates down to write-in status.

An unintended result of so many activists moving to a state with a liberty agenda would be the eventual exodus of dyed-in-the wool socialists. Those who want to get their good life from the taxes of others will have to move to greener pastures once the "bennies" dry up.

The wheels of socialism have been turning in Idaho like anywhere else in modern America. There will be resistance from the "there-oughta-be-a-law" politicians currently in power. And the hordes of agency employees will not go away with out a fight.

Local Government

Idaho's 44 counties use a three-Commissioner system for their management. Obtaining two of those seats by Porcupine-inclined activists would give broad control of county government. Commissioners, in addition to being the executive head of the county, have the power to pass or repeal ordinances. They also have limited judicial powers to hold hearings and determine certain issues. A modicum of effort could establish a "free county." This could become the base of operation for the establishment of a "Free State."

The Idaho legislature and people passed a constitutional Amendment a few years back allowing for optional forms of county government. The intent was to promote more socialistic forms of county government, but it also opens the door to "optional forms of county government," giving Porcupines some room for creative governance.

Citizen Initiatives and Referendums

Idaho has one of the best opportunities in the nation for direct citizen legislation. As a constitutionally-enshrined right, the people can make laws through the initiative process, or repeal legislation with a referendum. With one of the longest signature gathering periods in the country and reasonable initiative and referendum process requirements, Porcupines will be able to create a Free State "by first reforming state law."

The Idaho Constitution can be amended after a proposed amendment is passed by a super majority of both the Senate and the House, and then ratified by a simple majority vote of the people. A Porcupine legislature, with the consent of the people, could add liberty teeth to our state Constitution.

One Initiative is currently in process, that, if passed, will definitely help ensure Idaho's free state. The Idaho Judicial Accountability Act of 2004 will create a citizens commission to hear complaints of judicial misconduct and hold judicial officers accountable to the laws and Constitution. Once the judiciary is bound to obey the law, the legislative and executive branches will be compelled to follow.

Guns

Guns are a traditional component of Idaho culture. Gun stores, gun shows, and shooting ranges, informal and organized, are common in Idaho. Concealed carry permits are easy to get, as long as you provide fingerprints and pass a federal background check. Only convicted felons, drug addicts, and those declared mentally infirm can be denied a concealed carry permit in Idaho. Permit holders are exempt from the federal waiting period and background checks for gun purchases. State law allows concealed carry without a permit when you are not in a vehicle or an incorporated town. The state Constitution prohibits restrictive local gun laws and any firearms registration scheme.

As reasonable as they currently are, Idaho's gun laws could be improved. An unlicensed concealed carry law could be passed by a Porcupine legislature and replace the current concealed weapons license. An Idaho "Free State" could challenge the unconstitutional National Firearms Act of 1934 and the Gun Control Act of 1968. These and other federal disarmament laws could be repealed, at least within the "autonomous" borders of a free Idaho.

A Free State Militia

Idaho's Constitution already provides for a state militia. A Porcupine legislature could fulfill its constitutional duties to "enroll, equip and discipline" every able-bodied male between 18 and 45 to ensure Idaho's sovereign autonomy.

Federal Equations

The amount of federal land ownership in a state is being considered by the FSP for both positive and negative factors. "More federal land ownership might mean an excuse for federal meddling in the state, but it could also mean a legitimate grievance for the state's citizens."

Federal dependence, particularly whether a state receives more or less federal funding than it pays in federal taxes, is also factor being given consideration. States that get more federal handouts than they pay for are likely to be harder to wean from federal socialism. Idaho is in the middle of the pack of the FSP contenders on this issue.

The federal government claims to "own" two-thirds of Idaho under the presumptive administrative authority of The Forest Service and the BLM. There are considerable grounds for Idaho citizens to have a legitimate grievance. Especially when history, the current lethargic federal management schemes, and the constitutional facts of life are considered. The federal Constitution prohibits the federal government from owning any lands within a state except for certain military purposes and other needful buildings, and then, only after being purchased with the consent of the state legislature. The Idaho Constitution conveyed all property of the Idaho territory to the new state upon admission to the union. The Congress accepted, ratified, and confirmed the state Constitution in the Idaho Admission Act. But unconstitutional Presidential Proclamations usurped much of the Idaho public lands soon after it became a state (see The Big Lie) Two-thirds of Idaho is currently "administered" by a federal government which has no lawful authority to do so and is therefore prohibited by the Tenth Amendment from owning "public" forest and range lands.

Why doesn't Idaho resume management of the public lands fraudulently held by the federal government? Because the current political powers in Idaho don't want to rock the boat and risk losing their federal handouts. What would be the result if Free State activists assumed a majority position in state government and chose to give up all the federal handouts (which they plan to do anyway) and reassumed ownership of the two-thirds of Idaho that was unconstitutionally "taken"? Vast public resources, the size of any eastern state, could be managed by those most able to do so – the people who live here. Forestlands, mineral properties, rangelands, recreational resources, and even wilderness can be managed under the Idaho state motto – esto perpetua.

Resources

One criteria that appears to be missing from the FSP's evaluation of the states is resources. Especially natural ones. How can a state be independent and self reliant without the means to do so? The resource oversight is understandable, considering many of the FSP's founders are from the more urban eastern states, where resources are more likely to be acquired in commerce than by development.

The relative qualities and quantities of each prospective state's resources appears to have escaped the FSP's consideration. Western states typically have a much greater quantity and diversity of resources than the eastern states, and have populations of people who know what to do with them.

Sometimes known as the gem state, Idaho has abundant gems, precious and industrial metals, and minerals. Mining was one of the first post-European settlement activities.

Agriculture is common throughout Idaho and is a major component of the Idaho economy. Productive land is an important resource for any self-reliant Porcupine.

Idaho has supplied a wide variety of forest products for well over a century. We also have wilderness areas (nearly the size of New Hampshire) and other forestlands. With 20,000 activists to help wean us from federal handouts and work to reassume ownership of Idaho's federally occupied public lands, prospects could be good for Free State Idahoans. An accountable state government and the teeth of our current State Constitution's corporations article, could provide excellent management of our public lands while preventing some of the past corporate abuses of Idaho's resources.

Recreation has become a dominant industry in many areas. White-water rafting, skiing, snowmobiling, hunting, fishing, boating, and hiking are now major parts of the Idaho economy and common Idaho pastimes.

Native Peoples and the FSP

Many of Idaho's native peoples have established tribal gaming enterprises over the last decade or so. The proceeds enhance their tribal interests and provide additional revenue for schools and other infrastructures. With gaming enterprises, tribal economies have improved significantly.

On the one hand, Idaho's tribal members come from some very independent and self-reliant stock. Freedom is an inherent native tradition. On the other hand, more than a century of federally imposed administrative tribal governments, coupled with abundant socialistic hand out programs have weakened many tribal member's liberty spirit. Idaho native populations might be naturally inclined to support the principles of the FSP, once they are shown a model other than socialism to follow.

Alternative Schooling

Home schooling is common in Idaho with some reasonable cooperation between public schools and home schoolers on extra-curricular activities. Many home schoolers teach their children completely without government involvement. Children between the ages of 7 and 15 are required to attend some form of schooling. The statutory requirement only specifies that they be "otherwise comparably instructed." There is no state-required testing, teacher qualifications, or obligation to divulge the nature of the home school program. Home schoolers do not have to inform the school district that they are home schooling, and case law has established the burden of proof is upon the district to prove that any home schooling does not meet the statutory requirements.

Charter schools began a few years ago in Idaho, in what is essentially a state-funded, private school program. Time will tell how long "private" charter schools can remain on public funds. They do, however, tend to provide more bang for the buck – or less bucks – giving public schools much needed competition.

Vaccines

Like other states, Idaho has an active vaccination program. While most of the public literature portrays vaccinations as mandatory for school age and under children, it is a voluntary program. Exemption from the otherwise "required" vaccination of public and private school children is possible when a signed statement is filed, stating life or health endangering circumstances, religious or other objections.

Climate and Geography

Idaho has a wide variety of climates, terrain, and regions.

Central Idaho is largely a rugged mountain country that separates the other regions of Idaho. A two-lane highway passes through its western side, connecting northern and southern Idaho. At its core is a vast wilderness that is largely unroaded because of the terrain. Several major rivers have carved the deep canyons of Central Idaho where mostly small towns and rural settings are predominate. Climate varies with the elevation, from the high country covered with snow until July, to river bottoms and canyons that provide a "banana belt" and good gardening opportunities.

Northern Idaho is a mix of mountains, valleys, and prairies. Warm summers and moderate winters are common at the lower elevations. Climate is influenced more often by coastal weather than the central prairies. Couer d'Alene is the major city in North Idaho, which is dotted with many medium to smaller towns.

Southern Idaho contains the majority of Idaho's population and its political, economic, and industrial base. The Treasure Valley around the greater Boise area has a climate with hot summers and moderate winters. Urban and suburban development along the Snake River is surrounded by active agricultural production.

Eastern Idaho is a mix of high desert, mountains, and agriculturally developed prairies. Several eastern cities provide urban living opportunities, with many medium to small communities scattered across the mostly open terrain.

Idaho provides a vast array of rural living opportunities. High mountains, river valleys and canyons, the southern and eastern desert areas, the prairies and plains, offer many diverse choices for rurally inclined "Porcupines."

Economic Opportunities

Idaho ranks number one on both the FSP's projected jobs-growth analysis, and their economic freedom index. Contrary to the FSP's listing, Idaho does have a port in Lewiston. Although not a deep-water port for the larger ocean going vessels, many commercial products are barged up and down the Snake and Columbia Rivers. Rail service is available throughout Idaho. Idaho shares a short border with Canada and has two ports of entry.

Many businesses have relocated to Idaho because of lower taxes and less regulations when compared to other states. With some Porcupine influence, Idaho could improve this trend and become a gleaming example of a broad-based free-market economy.

Land-Use, Regulations, Building Codes and Federalism

Idaho is straddling the fence when it comes to land-use regulations and building codes. The forces of socialism and federalism have imposed active land-use strategies and construction requirements in most urban and suburban areas. The extent of the regulatory controls depends on how developed the area is. All counties have some form of building code on the books, but many, especially the rural counties, have lax enforcement of the code. Generally the farther you get from pavement the less regulation there is.

On the one hand, the wheels of social control have been turning in Idaho; on the other hand, socialism's wheels seem to be stuck in the ditch. For example, no contractor's license is required to build houses commercially, but you are required to get a landscapers license to plant shrubbery or install a lawn sprinkler system on the same house.

Many of the rural counties had building codes forced on them by FEMA, through federal flood insurance requirements. Similar federal back-door mandates are establishing citizen-tracking systems under the guise that emergency responders need a rural location identification system. The RIN or Rural Identification Number has been imposed on most rural Idahoans and is also conveniently useful for the construction of databases for citizen tracking and property mapping.

There are many other land-use and regulatory issues on the table that could be positively resolved by a herd of Porcupines. Road closures on public lands, "endangered" predator re-introduction, superfund sites, and environmental regulations are among the issues being imposed on Idaho by the federal government.

The Constitutional Defense Council

The Idaho Legislature has already paved the way for the Free State's plan to "finally negotiate directly with the federal government for appropriate political autonomy."

Under statute (Idaho Code 67-6301), the Constitutional Defense Council, which consists of the Governor, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House, and the Attorney General exists for the purpose of "restoring, maintaining and advancing the sovereignty and authority over issues that affect this state and the well-being of its citizens." Meetings of the council may be called by any member of the council, and may examine and challenge by legal action, legislation, or any other legal means: Federal mandates; Court rulings; The authority granted to, or assumed by, the federal government; Laws, regulations and practices of the federal government; And any other activity that is deemed appropriate by the council. The council may hire legal counsel and may utilize staff and resources within state government for these purposes.

Once enough Porcupines assume a majority of the offices which make up the Constitutional Defense Council, Idaho can begin to rein in the federal government.

The Case for Idaho

Consider the alternatives. If you're going to live somewhere, climate is important. It's easy to theorize about the relative importance of climate from an office in Florida or a house in California, but how many FSP Porcupines realistically want to hole up in Wyoming or the Dakotas for a high-plains winter? How many would be able to brave a harsh Alaskan winter and still be there in the spring? FSP meetings may not be well attended come February, when the gas lines in your car are frozen and the motor oil is thicker than grease.

If you want to attract a following it needs to be attractive for the long haul. A free state is not a one-year project. A cool but not too-cold Idaho canyon like the Clearwater, the Snake, or the Salmon might be more preferable in January than say, Bismarck ND.

And just what is the natural resource base of say, New Hampshire? How do free-staters plan to build a free-market export economy? Maple Syrup and hardwood flooring? Idaho already has diverse and productive natural resources in greater quantity than all the eastern state candidates combined. It also has the best economic prognosis according to the FSP's data.

The federal Constitution only authorizes federal ownership of lands within a state for four specific types of military purposes and other needful buildings. Once this fact becomes more widely known, and the federal usurpation of two-thirds of Idaho is properly challenged by 20,000 Porcupines (and a few more locals), we can "finally negotiate directly with the federal government for appropriate political autonomy." That's a lot of Idaho to build a free state with.

The political climate of Idaho is ripe for positive change. The republican majority in the legislature has upset much of the electorate by repealing a thrice-passed term limits law. The democrats are nearly DOA, and have been for years. The libertarians have made record progress and the Constitution Party is alive and well. That doesn't mean there aren't also a lot of lawyers, lobbyists, and socialists eager to maintain business as usual.

Let's get real. How many liberty-loving westerners would actually cross the Mississippi River to live? Easterners may like it there, but I don't think many westerners could call it home – even if we were the government. I've never been there, but I'll bet "rural" Vermont looks a lot more like "suburban" Idaho with deciduous trees. Size matters. And population density too.

Easterners and westerners are two different breeds of people. Are there only 20,000 liberty-oriented activists left in America? Eastern Porcupines would certainly be welcome out west, but what about a free state east and a free state west? We could alternate our annual free state convention and compare notes.

In all fairness there are a lot of good things that can be said about Montana as a choice for the FSP. Wyoming? Maybe. But Idaho, formerly known as the gem state, would make a great free state. I like it already: Idaho, "The Free State."